The appellant appealed the City of Brampton Committee of Adjustment's decision to deny a minor variance to permit a driveway width of 5.3 m, whereas the maximum permitted width is 4.9 m.
The appellant sought the variance to accommodate parking for an additional residential unit.
The Tribunal accepted the uncontested planning evidence of the City's planner that the variance failed to maintain the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, was not desirable, and was not minor due to adverse impacts on the streetscape and emergency access.
The appeal was dismissed.