The defendant brought a motion to dismiss the action for delay and failure to restore it to the trial list.
The plaintiff brought a cross-motion to restore the action to the trial list.
The court found that while the plaintiff's explanation for the delay was less than stellar, it was acceptable and not contumelious.
The court also found no non-compensable prejudice to the defendant.
The plaintiff's motion to restore the action was granted, and the defendant's motion to dismiss was dismissed, though a timetable for outstanding undertakings was ordered.
Costs of $4,000 were awarded to the defendant due to the plaintiff's delay and short service.