The appellants, three sisters, appealed a trial decision that dismissed their claims of physical abuse against their aunt and breach of fiduciary duty against the Attorney General of Canada.
The trial judge had found the appellants' evidence unreliable due to the passage of several decades since the alleged abuse.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding that the trial judge erred in principle by treating the passage of time as nearly determinative of reliability without adequately considering the context of adult testimony regarding childhood abuse, as guided by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. W. (R.).
The court ordered a new trial to properly assess the evidence.