The support payor brought a motion to change a consent order regarding child support arrears, seeking a stay of enforcement, the removal of a passport suspension, and the cessation of credit reporting by the Family Responsibility Office.
The Director argued the court lacked jurisdiction and that the issues were res judicata due to a prior dismissal in a related proceeding.
The court found the record insufficient to apply issue estoppel but held it lacked jurisdiction to reverse the Director's 16-year-old passport suspension or to order the withdrawal of accurate credit reporting.
The motion for a stay was also dismissed as the payor failed to establish a prima facie case for reducing the arrears payments.
