2 total
Judicial review of WSIAT decision denying time extension for WSIB appeal dismissed as reasonable.
The applicant, a migrant farm worker, sought judicial review of decisions by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal denying his request for an extension of time to appeal a 2008 decision denying his WSIB claim.
The applicant argued the tribunal overlooked his diligence, miscalculated the delay, and failed to consider his vulnerability as a migrant worker.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding the tribunal's decisions were reasonable, properly applied a holistic approach to the delay, and adequately considered the applicant's circumstances.
Leave to intervene granted on strict terms due to late motion and attempts to introduce new evidence.
The proposed interveners brought a late motion for leave to intervene in an application for judicial review.
The respondent opposed the motion, arguing the interveners lacked a distinct perspective and sought to supplement the evidentiary record.
The Divisional Court granted leave to intervene on strict terms, limiting the interveners to five minutes of oral submissions, prohibiting them from repeating the applicant's submissions, and barring them from supplementing the evidentiary record or taking a position on the ultimate disposition.
During the hearing, the interveners attempted to rely on new evidence, which the court rejected as procedurally unfair.
