The applicants sought a declaration that they had fully repaid a commercial loan to the respondent and an order preventing the respondent from exercising its right to convert the debt into shares.
The applicants had attempted to repay the loan via a wire transfer to the personal account of the respondent's principal, as the respondent had refused to provide wire instructions and insisted on strict compliance with the loan agreement.
The court found that the applicants failed to repay the loan in accordance with the strict terms of the agreement.
Consequently, the applicants' application was dismissed, and the respondent's cross-application to enforce its conversion rights was granted.