The Police Defendants brought a motion for a status hearing under Rule 48.14(5), (6), and (7) seeking an order to dismiss the action for delay.
The plaintiffs provided explanations for a four-year delay, primarily citing the incarceration of Krystle Oag, which made mandatory mediation impossible for a significant period.
The court found the incarceration to be an acceptable explanation for three of the four years of delay.
Despite a presumption of prejudice, the plaintiffs successfully rebutted it by demonstrating that all relevant documents were produced, key witness memories were captured in discovery transcripts, and all key witnesses remained available for trial.
The motion to dismiss for delay was dismissed, and no costs were awarded due to the poor quality of the plaintiffs' evidence explaining the delay.
The court also ordered a timetable for remaining interlocutory steps, including noting a defendant in default, mandatory mediation, and setting the action down for trial.