The appellant appealed a summary judgment dismissing his action against the respondents based on the expiry of the limitation period.
The appellant argued that a $5,000 cash payment from the respondents extended the limitation period, a claim the respondents denied.
The Court of Appeal found that while the motion judge properly refused an adjournment, he failed to resolve the material contradictions in the evidence regarding the alleged payment.
The appeal was allowed and the summary judgment was set aside.