The appellant appealed his convictions and sentences for various drug and property offences.
The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge erred in her treatment of a witness's preliminary inquiry evidence and failed to properly apply the W. (D.) principles to the exculpatory defence evidence.
As a result, the convictions for possession for the purpose of trafficking were substituted with simple possession.
The court also quashed convictions for simple possession of certain drugs where no such offence exists, quashed a property conviction as unreasonable, and quashed a money laundering conviction due to misdirection and lack of evidence.
Sentences on the remaining counts were reduced to time served.