Kevin M. Thompson

The tenant appealed a decision of the Landlord and Tenant Board dismissing her motion to void an eviction order under s. 74(11) of the Residential Tenancies Act.

The tenant argued that because she was on a month-to-month tenancy, s. 74(12), which limits a tenant to one such motion 'during the period of the tenant's tenancy agreement', reset every month.

The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the tenant's interpretation would lead to an absurd result and render the statutory limitation meaningless, as a month-to-month tenancy is a continuation of the same tenancy agreement.

Waterloo North Condominium Corporation No. 161 and John Curtis Redmond each brought applications concerning alleged breaches of condominium rules and common element maintenance issues, specifically regarding surface drainage and grading.

The parties subsequently entered into Minutes of Settlement, resolving all substantive disputes but reserving the question of costs for judicial determination.

The court declined to award costs to either party, emphasizing that where parties settle all substantive issues without judicial adjudication, the court should be reluctant to conduct a "paper trial" on the merits solely for the purpose of determining costs.