The applicant sought judicial review of a decision by the Guelph Police Services Board upholding the Chief of Police's revocation of its accessible taxi licence.
The Divisional Court found that while the Chief had the authority to revoke the licence, the Board's decision was unreasonable because it failed to provide adequate reasons resolving conflicts in the evidence regarding insurance and office hours.
The Court also granted the applicant leave to maintain the proceeding despite being in default of filing annual returns under the Corporations Information Act.
The Board's decision was set aside and a new hearing was ordered.
