The appellant appealed a lower court's decision, challenging the admissibility of a recording and the finding that a joint tenancy had been severed.
The Court of Appeal rejected the argument regarding the recording's inadmissibility, finding it relevant and admissible.
The court also found no basis to interfere with the application judge's decision on joint tenancy severance, as it was a fact-specific inquiry.
The appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against the estate, noting the litigation was necessitated by the deceased's actions.