The Applicant sought costs following a partially successful motion for disclosure from a non-party, Blue Water Metals.
The court found the Applicant more successful than Blue Water Metals, which had unreasonably resisted disclosure.
Considering the factors under Rule 24(11) of the Family Law Rules, including the importance of the issues, the parties' conduct, and counsel's rates, the court awarded the Applicant $7,000 in costs against Blue Water Metals.
No costs were ordered against the Respondent.