This costs endorsement followed substantive motions regarding a child's school attendance and residence.
The respondent, Mazin Jillood, was found primarily successful on the substantive motions.
The court considered Family Law Rule 24 regarding costs, including divided success and unreasonable behaviour of both parties.
While Mazin was successful on the main issue of school attendance and largely on residence, his "self-help" in removing the child from the applicant's care was deemed unreasonable.
The applicant, Deborah Friesen, also contributed to the dispute by unilaterally moving.
The court assessed the reasonableness and proportionality of costs, considering the importance and complexity of issues, time spent by counsel, and the parties' financial circumstances.
Ultimately, the court awarded Mazin $4,500.00 in all-inclusive costs, a reduction from the amount sought, and deferred payment until child and spousal support issues are resolved.