The appellant appealed decisions of the Licence Appeal Tribunal denying his motion to add new issues to his hearing and dismissing his claim for chiropractic treatment benefits.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no error of law or denial of procedural fairness in the Tribunal's refusal to add late issues.
The Court also upheld the Tribunal's finding that the appellant was not entitled to reimbursement for chiropractic treatments because he failed to submit the required treatment plans in advance, as mandated by section 38(2) of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.
