The plaintiff sought access to documents seized pursuant to an Anton Piller Order executed six months prior.
The defendants opposed, arguing the Order did not explicitly permit access and that review was premature.
The court found that the terms of the Order contemplated access by the Independent Supervising Solicitor (ISS) to identify and inspect records.
Given the passage of time and the discovery stage of the proceeding, the court directed the ISS to inspect the seized material and produce relevant records to the parties, noting the ISS provides protection against disclosure of irrelevant or privileged material.
