The moving party sought leave to appeal an interim child and spousal support order to the Divisional Court.
The interim order imputed income to the moving party due to non-disclosure and questionable business deductions.
The court applied the strict test for leave to appeal under Rule 62.02(4) of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
The court found no conflicting decisions, no reason to doubt the correctness of the interim order, and no issues of general or public importance.
The motion for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs awarded to the responding party.
