The appellants appealed the dismissal of their claim for a mandatory order requiring the respondents to relocate the venting of a furnace and hot water heater from the side to the top of the respondents' house.
The appellants had claimed that emissions from the side venting were obnoxious, caused fumes and vapours that made one appellant ill, caused ice buildup on their walkway, and posed potential future danger to their siding.
The trial judge found that the appellants' complaints did not constitute a substantial interference with their enjoyment of property under the law of nuisance, as the expert evidence was insufficient, health claims were unsupported by medical evidence, ice buildup was insignificant, and future damage claims were speculative.
The appellants did not appeal the dismissal of their damages claim but only the dismissal of the mandatory order claim.
The Court of Appeal found no merit in the appeal.