The applicant mother brought a motion for exclusive possession of the matrimonial home.
The court previously denied the motion, allowing the respondent father to remain in the home.
The mother renewed her motion, providing evidence of vitriolic and threatening text messages sent by the father.
The court found that the text messages constituted 'violence' under section 24(3)(f) of the Family Law Act, as they were intended to intimidate and caused psychological harm.
Given the violence and the risk of exposing the child to adult conflict, the court granted the mother exclusive possession of the matrimonial home.