The respondent mother moved to set aside a temporary order for the sale of the jointly owned matrimonial home and support, relying on Rule 25(19) of the Family Law Rules.
She alleged that the applicant father had committed fraud by failing to fully disclose his income.
The court dismissed the motion, finding no evidence that the father knowingly or recklessly made false statements with wrongful intent, noting that temporary orders are based on evolving evidence and a different finding on a fuller record does not constitute fraud.
