Gregory Patrick Weedon

The plaintiffs brought a motion to compel the defendant to re-attend an examination for discovery to answer questions regarding a tape recording of a conversation and its translation.

The defendant refused to answer, claiming privilege and arguing the translation was inadmissible.

The Master granted the motion, finding insufficient evidence of privilege to bar all questions and noting that admissibility is a matter for the trial judge.

The defendant was ordered to re-attend and answer the refused questions, with costs awarded to the plaintiffs.