Geneviève McSween

A journalist was subpoenaed to testify in support of an accused's motion for a stay of proceedings on the ground of abuse of process, seeking to identify government sources responsible for leaking confidential information.

The Court considered the new federal statutory scheme for the protection of journalistic sources in s. 39.1 of the Canada Evidence Act, enacted by the Journalistic Sources Protection Act, S.C. 2017, c. 22.

The majority held that the new scheme shifts the burden of proof to the party seeking disclosure, establishes reasonable necessity as a threshold requirement, and requires a balancing of the public interest in the administration of justice against the public interest in preserving the confidentiality of journalistic sources.

The appeal against the Quebec Court of Appeal's finding that it lacked jurisdiction was dismissed.

The appeal against the Superior Court's authorization of disclosure was allowed in part due to the Crown's change of position, with the case remanded to the court of original jurisdiction for reconsideration once new evidence from a government investigation is disclosed.

The dissent would have set aside the disclosure authorization outright, finding fundamental legal errors in the Superior Court's application of the new statutory scheme.

The CBC appealed a decision dismissing its motion to broadcast a video recording of a statement made by the accused to the police, which was tendered as an exhibit at trial.

The trial judge had held that the Rules of Practice of the Superior Court of the Province of Quebec, Criminal Division prohibited broadcasting the recording.

The Supreme Court of Canada held that the rules prohibit broadcasting recordings of proceedings, not exhibits.

Access to exhibits is governed by the open court principle, and trial judges must apply the Dagenais/Mentuck test to determine if broadcasting should be limited.

The appeal was dismissed as moot because the accused had been acquitted.