The appellant challenged a power of sale transfer of farm property on the basis that the mortgagee had failed to comply with the notice regime and stay provisions under the Farm Debt Review Act.
The court held that even assuming a later notice of sale served during the statutory stay was a nullity, an earlier amended notice of sale was not void merely because the creditor had not first given compliant notice under s. 22.
Applying prior authority, the court found the defect was a continuing breach and not fatal where the farmer became aware of the statutory protections, obtained the full stays available, and suffered no prejudice.
The court further held that a valid basis for the exercise of the power of sale could sustain the transfer even though the registered documents referred to a defective notice.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
