2 total
Convictions and 14-16 year sentences upheld for operators of massive clandestine ecstasy and methamphetamine lab.
The appellants were convicted of multiple offences related to their involvement in a large-scale clandestine drug lab producing MDMA, ketamine, and methamphetamine.
They appealed their convictions, arguing insufficient evidence of production and identification, and their sentences of 14 and 16 years, arguing the trial judge erred by treating lack of remorse as an aggravating factor.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the conviction appeals, finding ample circumstantial and identification evidence.
While the Court agreed the trial judge erred in considering lack of remorse as an aggravating factor, it upheld the sentences as proportionate given the massive scale of the operation and the danger of the drugs produced.
Presence and circumstances proved constructive possession of large-scale drug trafficking operation.
The accused was charged with possession of MDMA, ketamine, and methamphetamine for the purpose of trafficking and with producing those substances under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
Police discovered a large-scale clandestine drug laboratory inside a residence containing approximately 150 kilograms of finished drugs and extensive manufacturing equipment in plain view.
The accused was found inside the residence and his personal documents were located there.
The court held that the pervasive presence of drugs, odour, and equipment established the accused’s knowledge of the operation and that his presence and conduct supported an inference of control sufficient for constructive possession for the purpose of trafficking.
However, the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused participated in the production process.
