2 total
Solicitor negligence action dismissed; lawyer reasonably advised that territorial restriction precluded accident benefits for foreign accident.
The plaintiff was severely injured in a motorcycle accident in Jamaica.
She retained the defendant lawyer to investigate potential insurance claims.
The lawyer advised that her family's Ontario automobile insurance policy would not provide accident benefits due to a territorial restriction limiting coverage to North America, and thus did not file an application for benefits before the two-year limitation period expired.
The plaintiff sued the lawyer for professional negligence, arguing he should have filed the application to preserve her rights, especially given subsequent changes in case law.
The court dismissed the action, finding the lawyer met the standard of care of a reasonably competent expert in insurance law at the time, and that an application for benefits would likely have been denied anyway.
Appeal of professional negligence action against lawyer dismissed; trial judge's evidentiary rulings and findings upheld.
The appellant sued her former lawyer for professional negligence, alleging he settled her motor vehicle accident claim too soon and for too little.
The trial judge dismissed the action, finding the lawyer met the standard of care and the appellant was motivated to settle early.
On appeal, the appellant argued the trial judge erred in qualifying a mediator as an expert and in permitting a defence expert to testify despite a breach of an order excluding witnesses.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the trial judge's evidentiary rulings or her conclusion that the lawyer met the standard of care.