The two accused were charged with drugging and sexually assaulting two different complainants.
The first complainant alleged she was drugged and assaulted by one of the accused in 2003, but the court found reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in the timeline and lack of corroborating evidence.
The second complainant alleged she was drugged and assaulted by both accused in 2011 after a night of heavy drinking.
The court found reasonable doubt that she was drugged, noting her ability to walk and send text messages during the alleged timeframe.
The court also found reasonable doubt regarding her lack of consent, or alternatively, that the accused had an honest but mistaken belief in her consent.
Both accused were found not guilty on all charges.
