The appellant appealed a decision dismissing her application for adverse possession of a narrow strip of land behind the respondents' garage.
The application judge found that the appellant failed to prove actual possession of the disputed strip between 1998 and 2008, noting insufficient evidence of a fence restricting access.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, holding that the application judge's findings of fact and mixed fact and law were entitled to deference and were open to her on the record.
