Doron Lurie

The claimant filed a compensation claim against the Ministry of Transportation under the Expropriations Act.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a Case Management Conference to organize the proceeding.

The Tribunal approved the draft Procedural Order submitted by the parties and scheduled a nine-day hybrid hearing to commence in March 2027.

The parties submitted a consent request to amend a previously issued procedural order in an expropriation compensation claim.

The Ontario Land Tribunal rescinded the December 6, 2024 procedural order and issued a revised procedural order establishing the timetable for pre-hearing steps, mediation, and a 25-day hearing scheduled to commence in March 2026.

The parties submitted a draft procedural order on consent regarding a claim for compensation under the Expropriations Act.

The Ontario Land Tribunal considered and revised the terms, issuing the procedural order to govern the pre-hearing steps and scheduling a 25-day in-person hearing to commence on March 2, 2026.

The claimant brought a claim for compensation under the Expropriations Act relating to the expropriation of a portion of its lands by Metrolinx.

At the first Case Management Conference, the parties agreed to participate in Tribunal-led mediation and requested hearing dates in 2025 in case mediation is unsuccessful.

The Tribunal scheduled a 10-day video hearing commencing in June 2025 and approved the parties' consent Procedural Order.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a status conference to schedule a land compensation arbitration.

The parties consented to a 10-day hearing commencing December 2, 2024.

The Tribunal issued a procedural order governing the conduct of the proceeding, including deadlines for expert reports, witness statements, and a joint document book.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a first Case Management Conference regarding a claim for compensation arising from the expropriation of the claimant's lands for a Light Rail Transit System.

As the parties were not yet ready for case management and intended to discuss potential resolution, the Tribunal issued directives for future scheduling, status reporting, and the eventual submission of a draft Procedural Order.

The claimant brought a motion to compel the respondent to provide answers to questions and produce documents refused at an examination for discovery.

At the commencement of the hearing, the claimant requested an adjournment sine die, indicating that a settlement was expected within a month.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment and directed the parties to provide a status update in one month, while maintaining the previously scheduled hearing dates.