The parties brought competing motions in a family law proceeding.
The respondent husband sought summary judgment declaring the valuation date as June 30, 2008, while the applicant wife claimed the date was December 20, 2019.
The court dismissed the husband's motion, finding his evidence disingenuous and setting the valuation date at December 20, 2019.
The court granted the wife's motion for interim spousal support, imputing an income of $838,000 to the husband and ordering him to pay $25,000 per month.
The court also granted the wife leave to question the family's long-time lawyer as a non-party, but dismissed her request for interim disbursements without prejudice.