The accused, a paraplegic, was charged with sexual assault against his Personal Support Worker (PSW).
The complainant alleged the accused groped and kissed her during a routine morning visit, which the accused denied.
Applying the W.D. credibility analysis, the court found the accused not credible due to evasive testimony regarding his physical capabilities.
The complainant was found credible and reliable despite minor inconsistencies, with the court noting her demeanor, lack of exaggeration, and absence of a financial motive to fabricate.
The court emphasized the cautious use of demeanor and post-offence conduct as credibility factors.
The accused was convicted of sexual assault.