David Gregory Flude

The applicants appealed a Notice of Proposal by the Registrar to refuse and revoke their registration under the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act, 2002.

The parties reached a written settlement and applied for a consent order without a hearing pursuant to section 4.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal ordered that the proceedings be concluded on the basis of the agreed terms and conditions, which included strict compliance with registration, advertising, disclosure, and record-keeping requirements.

The applicant appealed a Notice of Proposal by the Registrar to revoke his registration under the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act, 2002.

The parties reached a settlement and applied for a consent order without a hearing pursuant to section 4.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal issued a consent order incorporating the terms of the settlement, which included conditions that the applicant not act as a partner, shareholder, officer, director, or controlling mind of a dealer, and not apply to be a motor vehicle dealer for a period of two years.

The Applicants appealed Tarion's decision to deny their warranty claim for mould remediation in their basement crawlspace.

After Tarion warranted the mould issue, the Applicants refused to allow the builder access to test and remediate, instead hiring their own contractor and demanding Tarion pay the invoice.

The Tribunal found that the Applicants breached the statutory warranty scheme by denying the builder its right to repair, and that the Applicants' chosen contractor did not perform industry-standard mould remediation.

The appeal was dismissed.