The applicant brought a motion seeking exclusive possession of the matrimonial home, primary residence and sole decision-making for the children, and supervised parenting time for the respondent.
The court noted highly conflicting and untested affidavit evidence regarding serious allegations of abuse and parenting.
The court ordered a Section 30 assessment to be conducted by a psychologist or psychiatrist.
Pending the assessment, the court ordered temporary-temporary nesting arrangements for the matrimonial home, a specific shared parenting schedule with the children's nanny present during the respondent's time, and general communication rules.
The court declined to make findings on most allegations due to conflicting evidence but noted concerns regarding the respondent's anger management and inappropriate communication about the youngest child, which influenced the temporary parenting plan.