Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Applications withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its applications against the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the applications.

Ontario Public Service Employees Union v. Gamma - Dynacare Medical Laboratories, 2001 CanLII 4656

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Decertification application dismissed for failing to include written evidence of employee wishes.

The applicant applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the responding party trade union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.

The application was dismissed because it was not accompanied by written evidence signed by the employees expressing a wish not to be represented by the trade union, as required by the Board's Rules.

Woollatt Employees v. Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 1059, 2001 CanLII 4249

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant filed an application against the responding party union, with the employer intervening.

The application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

Virginia Sabatino v. Ontario Public Service Employees Union and its Local 274, 2001 CanLII 2813

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant, Guy Guerette, sought to withdraw his application against the responding party, U.A.W. Local 251.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Guy Guerette v. U.A.W. Local 251, 2001 CanLII 18928

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Board issued procedural directions for written submissions in a section 114(2) application.

The Ontario Public Service Employees Union filed an application under section 114(2) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 against St. Joseph's Health Care London.

As the parties were unable to settle the dispute, the Ontario Labour Relations Board issued procedural directions requiring the parties to file written submissions detailing the material facts and reasons for their positions.

The Board noted it would review the submissions to determine whether to decide the matter based on the written materials or to hold a hearing.

Ontario Public Service Employees Union v. St. Joseph’s Health Care London, 2001 CanLII 14533

Timothy W. Sargeant

Matters adjourned on consent to a date to be set after November 1, 2001.

The parties requested an adjournment of the matters.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and adjourned the matters to a date to be set following November 1, 2001.

Apollo Health & Beauty Care v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local 175, 2001 CanLII 10448

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant sought to withdraw her application against Providence Continuing Care Centre, Mental Health Services.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Ms. Heather Doney v. Providence Continuing Care Centre, Mental Health Services, 2001 CanLII 6068

Timothy W. Sargeant

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 21, 2001

Board directs applicant to file detailed statement responding to union's submissions in duty of fair representation complaint.

The applicant filed a duty of fair representation complaint alleging the union refused to grieve his termination and denial of accommodation.

The union filed a detailed response.

The Board declined to dismiss the application for failing to make out a prima facie case at this stage.

Instead, the Board directed the applicant to file a statement detailing his disagreement with the union's response and providing support for his allegations of termination and sought accommodation.

John Foote v. Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 506, 2001 CanLII 16402

Timothy W. Sargeant

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 19, 2001

Hearing scheduled for November 5, 2001.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a procedural decision scheduling a hearing for November 5, 2001.

The Vice-Chair retained jurisdiction over the matter.

Jim Beveridge v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113, 2001 CanLII 9514

Timothy W. Sargeant

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 18, 2001

Board directs responding party to file submissions on applicant's request for an interim certificate.

The applicant requested the issuance of an interim certificate for a proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed the responding party to file submissions regarding the issuance of the interim certificate and the proposed bargaining unit by September 21, 2001.

Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Canadian Corps of Commissionaires – Ottawa Division, 2001 CanLII 15697

Sunil Kapur

In Private Practice13 cases1999–2017

Murray Klein

22 cases2000–2002

Lesley G Boyles

1 case2001–2001

Timothy W. Sargeant

Employment standards appeal terminated after applicant withdrew the appeal at the hearing.

The applicant appealed an Employment Standards Officer's decision not to make an order under the Employment Standards Act.

At the hearing, the applicant withdrew the appeal.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board terminated the matter.

Darlene Latoski v. Bel-Tronics Company and Ministry of Labour, 2001 CanLII 18257

Brian Blumenthal

8 cases1999–2011

Timothy W. Sargeant

Employer's appeal of an Order to Pay dismissed due to failure to appear at the hearing.

The applicant employer appealed an Order to Pay issued under the Employment Standards Act.

A hearing was scheduled, but the applicant failed to appear or request an adjournment.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the appeal and confirmed the Order to Pay.

Stephen Shub operating as Shub and Associates v. Anna Chatzinikolaou and Ministry of Labour, 2001 CanLII 5569

Timothy W. Sargeant

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 14, 2001

Request to reconsider scheduling and consolidation decision dismissed; issues deferred to hearing panel.

The responding party requested reconsideration of a Board decision regarding hearing dates and the consolidation of multiple files.

The Board declined to reconsider its decision or alter the directions at this time, noting that the responding party could raise these issues with the panel assigned to hear the matter.

Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union, Local 593 v. Lakeline Transportation Services, 2001 CanLII 2999

Timothy W. Sargeant

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 13, 2001

Application for review dismissed after applicant failed to attend and employer proved settlement cheque was cashed.

The applicant sought a review of an Employment Standards Officer's decision, alleging the employer failed to comply with a settlement because the settlement cheque was not honoured by the bank.

The applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

At the hearing, the employer provided evidence satisfying the Board that the settlement cheque had indeed been cashed by the applicant.

The application for review was dismissed.

Zengjia Wang v. Sa Sha Wear Inc. and Ministry of Labour, 2001 CanLII 13708

Colin B. Johnston

2 cases2001–2001

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 11, 2001

Applicant directed to serve application on responding party's counsel.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the applicant to serve the responding party with a copy of the application via fax or courier to the responding party's counsel.

The responding party was granted ten days from receipt to file a response.

Daniel R. Crosmas v. Communication, Energy and Paperworkers Union – Local 1999, 2001 CanLII 8870

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

Alex Nazareth v. Teamsters International Union Local 938, 2001 CanLII 18882

Timothy W. Sargeant

R. R. Montague

J. A. Rundle

Union certified as bargaining agent for nurses following successful representation vote.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for registered and graduate nurses employed by the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation & General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Leamington United Mennonite Home and Apartments, 2001 CanLII 15269

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Rundle

H. Peacock

Extension of time granted for employer to file an intervention.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted an extension of time until September 28, 2001, for the employer to file an intervention in the matter.

Quang Chiem v. United Steelworkers of America Local 4970, 2001 CanLII 14815

Timothy W. Sargeant

R. R. Montague

J. A. Rundle

Employment and Labour Law

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

United Steelworkers of America v. Northcast Inc., 2001 CanLII 12960

for AAS Telecommunications Services Ltd.

Norm RhoraAgent
1 appearance

for Active Answering Services

David IveyCounsel
1 appearance

for Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113

Henry UrbanCounsel
1 appearance
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Mike BraganCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW Local 252

Muneshwar DeopaulUnion representative
1 appearance
Catherine GilbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kim BirminghamUnion representative
1 appearance
Sukvinder JohlUnion representative
1 appearance

for Communications Energy & Paperworkers Union of Canada

Sean FitzpatrickUnion representative
1 appearance

for CUPE Local 2357

Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance

for Francis Naraine

Francis NaraineSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Grey Bruce Health Services

Jennifer KierinkiewiezCounsel
1 appearance
Robert HickmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Local 109 the Intervenor

Stan LukeCounsel
1 appearance
Brian PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Dennis BertrandCounsel
1 appearance
Stephen SatchelCounsel
1 appearance

for London & District Service Workers Union, Local 220

Jim RenaudUnion representative
1 appearance

for Northern Ontario Joint Council of the Retail Wholesales and Department Store Union District Counsel of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union

Robin McArthurCounsel
1 appearance
Bernard FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance
Jim WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Nurses' Association

Gail SaxCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Public Services Employees' Union

Terry MooreCounsel
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for Ottawa-Carleton Catholic District School Board

John ReadCounsel
1 appearance

for Rogers Cantel Paging Inc.

Alison E. RentonCounsel
1 appearance

for SCEU Local 272

Frederica WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for SERCA Food Service Inc.

Hugh SecordCounsel
1 appearance
Bob WuestCounsel
1 appearance
Julie WoodCounsel
1 appearance
F. G. HamiltonCounsel
1 appearance

for Teamsters Local Union No. 419

Marisa PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Tom FraserCounsel
1 appearance

for Terex Bartell Limited

Stewart SaxeCounsel
1 appearance
Margaret McCluckieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Amicus Curiae

Rodney G. WalshCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Linda MorganAgent
2 appearances
Robert JutrasAgent
2 appearances
Peter J. ThorupCounsel
2 appearances
David DooreyCounsel
2 appearances
H. KopytoAgent
1 appearance
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
1 appearance
Hikmart BilalUnion representative
1 appearance
Nancy RosenbergCounsel
1 appearance
Eva KissSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nuno Dos SantosSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ed BosveldCounsel
1 appearance
Glennis HarwigAgent
1 appearance
Roger CnarbonneauAgent
1 appearance
Gerry DoucetUnion representative
1 appearance
Danielle HenzelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ian WeibeAgent
1 appearance
Brando ParisCounsel
1 appearance
Tim CostiganCounsel
1 appearance
Ken MylesAgent
1 appearance
Betty Jane BurkittSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

David Campbell JohnsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the applicant Rick Wazid

Sandra HinksmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicants

Alan MonfortonCounsel
1 appearance
Allan SimonCounsel
1 appearance
Seema LamnaCounsel
1 appearance
Doug MaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith McConnellCounsel
1 appearance
Al LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Charles MilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marish RowanCounsel
1 appearance
Michael Wade AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marie BennardoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hugh MillsCounsel
1 appearance
Tom FraserCounsel
1 appearance
Armand LamondayCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant United Steelworkers of America

James HayesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 5167

Gus OliveiraCounsel
1 appearance
Nick MilanovicCounsel
1 appearance
Michael StokesCounsel
1 appearance

for the claimant

Robert CombeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maeve RandallAgent
1 appearance

for the Employee

Cecil NormanAgent
1 appearance

for the employer

Michael HoranCounsel
2 appearances
Zhou Hong, XiaAgent
1 appearance

for the Hamilton Housing Corporation and the Corporation of The City of Hamilton

Leslie A. LerouxCounsel
1 appearance
Mike KearnyCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual applicants

Keith McConnellCounsel
1 appearance
Alan MonfortonCounsel
1 appearance
Armand LamondayCounsel
1 appearance
Seema LammaCounsel
1 appearance
Hugh MillsCounsel
1 appearance
Allan SimonCounsel
1 appearance
Al LeeCounsel
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Spiros BostasCounsel
1 appearance
Marvin KalchmanAgent
1 appearance
Stephen A. McArthurCounsel
1 appearance
Dan RobichaudCounsel
1 appearance
John SaundersCounsel
1 appearance
J. Cameron NolanCounsel
1 appearance
Peter F. ChauvinCounsel
1 appearance
Keith BillingsCounsel
1 appearance
Kim FarringtonCounsel
1 appearance
Janice CarneyAgent
1 appearance
Anne CummingUnion representative
1 appearance
Mitch GrossmanCounsel
1 appearance
Dolores M. BarbiniCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth KosmidisAgent
1 appearance
Landon YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Lith MartellAgent
1 appearance
Dirk Van de KamerCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa J. KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Dan HaffeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lith MartellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Martin AddarioCounsel
1 appearance
Samara B. KaplanCounsel
1 appearance
Leslee WillsCounsel
1 appearance
Ken BeckerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Labour

Frank CamilleriAgent
4 appearances
Karima ChaturCounsel
3 appearances
Laurie EisenbergCounsel
3 appearances
Murray KleinCounsel
2 appearances
Jeremy WarningCounsel
2 appearances
Brian BlumenthalCounsel
1 appearance
Robert SindingCounsel
1 appearance
Frank CamilleriCounsel
1 appearance
Karima ChaturAgent
1 appearance
Heidi Ann Lazar-MeynAgent
1 appearance
Heidi Ann Lazar-MeynCounsel
1 appearance

for themselves

Sergio NoblioneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert FrangosSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Cliff DeQuettvilleCounsel
1 appearance
Tim HanniganCounsel
1 appearance
Diane NicholCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance
Mike GallizziCounsel
1 appearance
Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance
Eileen WesleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding parties

Richard LumleyAgent
1 appearance
Harold F. CaleyCounsel
1 appearance
Norm GuenetteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard PotuinAgent
1 appearance
Garry BergeronCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding party

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea BowkerCounsel
2 appearances
Malvinder S. KhatraAgent
2 appearances
Gregory McGinnisCounsel
2 appearances
F G. HamiltonCounsel
1 appearance
Lesley G BoylesCounsel
1 appearance
Gerald CrannAgent
1 appearance
Daniel J. ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance
Lee PattersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary C. ObermaierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carol NielssinCounsel
1 appearance
Roy RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance
Jim WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Sean ClancyUnion representative
1 appearance
Cynthia WatsonCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MitchellCounsel
1 appearance
Gary KingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim HowardCounsel
1 appearance
Bernie BruninoCounsel
1 appearance
Colin WongSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Responding Party

Ming DengAgent
1 appearance
Foon Ho LeeAgent
1 appearance
Sue LeeAgent
1 appearance
Qun Xi DengAgent
1 appearance

for the responding party union

Sean FloydCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding trade union

Brian ShularCounsel
1 appearance
Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Gail McCormickCounsel
1 appearance
Joleen NicholCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HavellCounsel
1 appearance

for the union

Paula TurtleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Paula TurtleCounsel
1 appearance

for UFCW International

Doug ClemmensenCounsel
1 appearance
Brian NoonanCounsel
1 appearance
John R. EvanCounsel
1 appearance

for UFCW Local 393W

Tony DeBartolomeoUnion representative
1 appearance
Frank StirpeUnion representative
1 appearance
Carlos GarciaUnion representative
1 appearance

690

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.9

cases/mo

OLRB690(100%)

Decision types

motion

557

trial

101

appeal

/Adjudicator

Timothy W. Sargeant — Vice-Chair

Other Tribunals

Administrative Law

Human Rights

Timothy W. Sargeant

Vice-Chair·Ontario Labour Relations Board·Since 1997

690

cases · 5 yrs · OLRB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-Chair· 283Vice-Chair· 266Vice-Chair· 123Vice-Chair· Chair· 6Adjudicator/Referee· 3Vice-Chair· Chair· 2Vice Chair· 2Vice‑Chair· 1

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant union requested to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Teamsters Local Union 938 v. Ed Mirvish Enterprises Limited, 2001 CanLII 5857

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Applications withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its applications against the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the applications.

Ontario Public Service Employees Union v. Gamma - Dynacare Medical Laboratories, 2001 CanLII 4656

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Decertification application dismissed for failing to include written evidence of employee wishes.

The application was dismissed because it was not accompanied by written evidence signed by the employees expressing a wish not to be represented by the trade union, as required by the Board's Rules.

Woollatt Employees v. Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 1059, 2001 CanLII 4249

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant filed an application against the responding party union, with the employer intervening.

The application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

Virginia Sabatino v. Ontario Public Service Employees Union and its Local 274, 2001 CanLII 2813

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant, Guy Guerette, sought to withdraw his application against the responding party, U.A.W. Local 251.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Guy Guerette v. U.A.W. Local 251, 2001 CanLII 18928

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Board issued procedural directions for written submissions in a section 114(2) application.

The Ontario Public Service Employees Union filed an application under section 114(2) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 against St. Joseph's Health Care London.

The Board noted it would review the submissions to determine whether to decide the matter based on the written materials or to hold a hearing.

Ontario Public Service Employees Union v. St. Joseph’s Health Care London, 2001 CanLII 14533

Timothy W. Sargeant

Matters adjourned on consent to a date to be set after November 1, 2001.

The parties requested an adjournment of the matters.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and adjourned the matters to a date to be set following November 1, 2001.

Apollo Health & Beauty Care v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local 175, 2001 CanLII 10448

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant sought to withdraw her application against Providence Continuing Care Centre, Mental Health Services.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Ms. Heather Doney v. Providence Continuing Care Centre, Mental Health Services, 2001 CanLII 6068

Timothy W. Sargeant

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 21, 2001

Board directs applicant to file detailed statement responding to union's submissions in duty of fair representation complaint.

The applicant filed a duty of fair representation complaint alleging the union refused to grieve his termination and denial of accommodation.

The union filed a detailed response.

The Board declined to dismiss the application for failing to make out a prima facie case at this stage.

Instead, the Board directed the applicant to file a statement detailing his disagreement with the union's response and providing support for his allegations of termination and sought accommodation.

John Foote v. Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 506, 2001 CanLII 16402

Timothy W. Sargeant

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 19, 2001

Hearing scheduled for November 5, 2001.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a procedural decision scheduling a hearing for November 5, 2001.

The Vice-Chair retained jurisdiction over the matter.

Jim Beveridge v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113, 2001 CanLII 9514

Timothy W. Sargeant

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 18, 2001

Board directs responding party to file submissions on applicant's request for an interim certificate.

The applicant requested the issuance of an interim certificate for a proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed the responding party to file submissions regarding the issuance of the interim certificate and the proposed bargaining unit by September 21, 2001.

Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Canadian Corps of Commissionaires – Ottawa Division, 2001 CanLII 15697

Sunil Kapur

In Private Practice13 cases1999–2017

Murray Klein

22 cases2000–2002

Lesley G Boyles

1 case2001–2001

Timothy W. Sargeant

Employment standards appeal terminated after applicant withdrew the appeal at the hearing.

The applicant appealed an Employment Standards Officer's decision not to make an order under the Employment Standards Act.

At the hearing, the applicant withdrew the appeal.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board terminated the matter.

Darlene Latoski v. Bel-Tronics Company and Ministry of Labour, 2001 CanLII 18257

Brian Blumenthal

8 cases1999–2011

Timothy W. Sargeant

Employer's appeal of an Order to Pay dismissed due to failure to appear at the hearing.

The applicant employer appealed an Order to Pay issued under the Employment Standards Act.

A hearing was scheduled, but the applicant failed to appear or request an adjournment.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the appeal and confirmed the Order to Pay.

Stephen Shub operating as Shub and Associates v. Anna Chatzinikolaou and Ministry of Labour, 2001 CanLII 5569

Timothy W. Sargeant

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 14, 2001

Request to reconsider scheduling and consolidation decision dismissed; issues deferred to hearing panel.

The responding party requested reconsideration of a Board decision regarding hearing dates and the consolidation of multiple files.

The Board declined to reconsider its decision or alter the directions at this time, noting that the responding party could raise these issues with the panel assigned to hear the matter.

Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union, Local 593 v. Lakeline Transportation Services, 2001 CanLII 2999

Timothy W. Sargeant

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 13, 2001

Application for review dismissed after applicant failed to attend and employer proved settlement cheque was cashed.

The applicant sought a review of an Employment Standards Officer's decision, alleging the employer failed to comply with a settlement because the settlement cheque was not honoured by the bank.

The applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

At the hearing, the employer provided evidence satisfying the Board that the settlement cheque had indeed been cashed by the applicant.

The application for review was dismissed.

Zengjia Wang v. Sa Sha Wear Inc. and Ministry of Labour, 2001 CanLII 13708

Colin B. Johnston

2 cases2001–2001

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 11, 2001

Applicant directed to serve application on responding party's counsel.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the applicant to serve the responding party with a copy of the application via fax or courier to the responding party's counsel.

The responding party was granted ten days from receipt to file a response.

Daniel R. Crosmas v. Communication, Energy and Paperworkers Union – Local 1999, 2001 CanLII 8870

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

Alex Nazareth v. Teamsters International Union Local 938, 2001 CanLII 18882

Timothy W. Sargeant

R. R. Montague

J. A. Rundle

Union certified as bargaining agent for nurses following successful representation vote.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for registered and graduate nurses employed by the responding party.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation & General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Leamington United Mennonite Home and Apartments, 2001 CanLII 15269

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Rundle

H. Peacock

Extension of time granted for employer to file an intervention.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted an extension of time until September 28, 2001, for the employer to file an intervention in the matter.

Quang Chiem v. United Steelworkers of America Local 4970, 2001 CanLII 14815

Timothy W. Sargeant

R. R. Montague

J. A. Rundle