Timothy W. Sargeant

The applicant sought to withdraw the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees of the responding party who were currently represented by the intervenor.

The Board confirmed the applicant's status as a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Finding that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support of at least forty percent of the proposed bargaining unit, the Board directed that a representation vote be held.

Eligible employees will vote on whether they wish to be represented by the applicant or the intervenor.

The applicants applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the responding party trade union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.

The Board found the application timely and that not less than forty per cent of the employees had expressed a wish not to be represented by the trade union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

The applicant union filed an application for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.

As no statement of desire to have an oral hearing was filed, the Board dismissed the application.

The Board directed the parties' attention to section 10(3) of the Act regarding the effect on any subsequent application filed within one year.

The parties requested an adjournment of the matters.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and adjourned the matters to a date to be set following November 1, 2001.

The Ontario Public Service Employees Union filed an application under section 114(2) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 against St. Joseph's Health Care London.

As the parties were unable to settle the dispute, the Ontario Labour Relations Board issued procedural directions requiring the parties to file written submissions detailing the material facts and reasons for their positions.

The Board noted it would review the submissions to determine whether to decide the matter based on the written materials or to hold a hearing.

The applicant, Guy Guerette, sought to withdraw his application against the responding party, U.A.W. Local 251.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant sought to withdraw her application against Providence Continuing Care Centre, Mental Health Services.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant filed a duty of fair representation complaint alleging the union refused to grieve his termination and denial of accommodation.

The union filed a detailed response.

The Board declined to dismiss the application for failing to make out a prima facie case at this stage.

Instead, the Board directed the applicant to file a statement detailing his disagreement with the union's response and providing support for his allegations of termination and sought accommodation.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a procedural decision scheduling a hearing for November 5, 2001.

The Vice-Chair retained jurisdiction over the matter.

The applicant requested the issuance of an interim certificate for a proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed the responding party to file submissions regarding the issuance of the interim certificate and the proposed bargaining unit by September 21, 2001.

The applicant employer appealed an Order to Pay issued under the Employment Standards Act.

A hearing was scheduled, but the applicant failed to appear or request an adjournment.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the appeal and confirmed the Order to Pay.

The applicant appealed an Employment Standards Officer's decision not to make an order under the Employment Standards Act.

At the hearing, the applicant withdrew the appeal.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board terminated the matter.

The responding party requested reconsideration of a Board decision regarding hearing dates and the consolidation of multiple files.

The Board declined to reconsider its decision or alter the directions at this time, noting that the responding party could raise these issues with the panel assigned to hear the matter.

The applicant sought a review of an Employment Standards Officer's decision, alleging the employer failed to comply with a settlement because the settlement cheque was not honoured by the bank.

The applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

At the hearing, the employer provided evidence satisfying the Board that the settlement cheque had indeed been cashed by the applicant.

The application for review was dismissed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the applicant to serve the responding party with a copy of the application via fax or courier to the responding party's counsel.

The responding party was granted ten days from receipt to file a response.

The applicant, Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 53, sought to withdraw its application against the Corporation of the Town of Whitby.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The responding party requested that the Board order the removal of the scrutinizer appointed by the applicant for a representation vote.

The Board declined the request, noting that the vote is conducted under the auspices of a Board officer who oversees the procedure, and therefore the Board will not interfere with the applicant's choice of scrutinizer.

The applicant applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted an extension of time until September 28, 2001, for the employer to file an intervention in the matter.