Timothy W. Sargeant

The applicant union sought an interim certificate for a bargaining unit of employees of the Canadian Corps of Commissionaires.

The parties agreed on the bargaining unit description except for the inclusion of Shift Supervisors at the rank of Sergeant, which the responding party argued should be excluded under section 1(3)(b) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found that the applicant's right to certification would not be affected by the ultimate decision on the disputed classification, as more than fifty percent of the ballots cast were in favour of the applicant regardless.

The Board exercised its discretion under section 9(2) of the Act to issue an interim certificate pending the final resolution of the bargaining unit's composition.

The Board granted an extension of time until October 19, 2001, for the responding party to file a response in the matter.

The applicant filed an application under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the responding party union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.

The Board found the application timely and that not less than forty percent of the employees had expressed a wish not to be represented by the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent electricians and apprentices employed by the responding party.

The intervenor union and the responding party objected, arguing that the employees were already represented by the intervenor in the construction sector and that the application was untimely.

The Board found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient membership support to warrant a representation vote.

The Board ordered the vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed and the ballots not counted until the objections were resolved.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted an extension of time until October 10, 2001, to file a response in the matter.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the responding party an extension of time until September 28, 2001, to file a response in the matter.

The responding party employer requested a reconsideration of the Board's decision dated September 25, 2001, seeking to change the date of the representation vote or to seal the ballot box.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board declined to reconsider its decision and dismissed the requests.

The applicant requested an extension of time to file a response.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the extension until October 16, 2001.

The applicant trade union applied for certification.

The responding party failed to file a response within the stipulated time.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union at the time the application was made.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the individuals in the voting constituency.

The Ontario Public Service Employees Union and the employer agreed upon the terms of a collective agreement prior to a scheduled hearing for a Ministerial Reference under section 3(2) of the Hospital Labour Disputes Arbitration Act.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board cancelled the hearing and terminated the matter, subject to any contrary direction from the Minister within 10 days.

The applicant filed an application against the responding party union, with the employer intervening.

The application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant sought a declaration under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 to terminate the responding party union's bargaining rights.

The union advised the Board in writing that it no longer wished to represent the employees in the bargaining unit.

Pursuant to section 63(17) of the Act, the Board issued a declaration that the union no longer represents the employees of Steeves and Rozema Enterprises Ltd.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its applications against the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the applications.

The applicant applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the responding party trade union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.

The application was dismissed because it was not accompanied by written evidence signed by the employees expressing a wish not to be represented by the trade union, as required by the Board's Rules.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Despite a dispute over the estimated number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit, the Board found sufficient membership support to direct a representation vote.

The vote was ordered for the proposed constituency, with eligible voters being those employed on the application filing date.

The applicant union filed an application for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.

As no statement of desire to have an oral hearing was filed, the Board dismissed the application.

The Board directed the parties' attention to section 10(3) of the Act regarding the effect on any subsequent application filed within one year.

The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees of the responding party who were currently represented by the intervenor.

The Board confirmed the applicant's status as a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Finding that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support of at least forty percent of the proposed bargaining unit, the Board directed that a representation vote be held.

Eligible employees will vote on whether they wish to be represented by the applicant or the intervenor.

The applicants applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the responding party trade union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.

The Board found the application timely and that not less than forty per cent of the employees had expressed a wish not to be represented by the trade union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

The applicant sought to withdraw the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union requested to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.