Stephen Raymond

The applicant union filed an application against the responding party employer.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the application withdrawn.

The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matter would be deemed terminated if no party requested to proceed within that time.

The applicant municipality applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board regarding a representation vote.

The Board had previously issued an interim order under section 37(7) of the Public Sector Labour Relations Transitions Act to supervise a representation vote before the changeover date.

In this decision, the Board directed the parties to file submissions on whether any further action was required and the jurisdictional basis for such action, failing which the application would be terminated.

The applicant, a director of a company that operated charity casinos, appealed an Order to Pay issued under the Employment Standards Act for unpaid wages and vacation pay.

At the hearing, the applicant conceded the claimants were employees, not independent contractors.

Due to a lack of payroll records, the Board relied on the claimants' invoice records to substantiate vacation pay claims but denied unsubstantiated claims for unpaid wages.

The Board ordered the applicant to pay the substantiated amounts to ten claimants.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and the resolution of representations from the responding party, the Board issued a final decision without a hearing.

The Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate and directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor union by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.

Notice of the application was provided to the responding party employer and the predecessor union, and notices were posted at the employer's premises.

The application was unopposed.

The Board granted the application and issued the requested declaration.

The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement resolving the matter.

At the request of the applicant, the application was withdrawn.

The Vice-Chair remained seized of any matters arising from the implementation of the settlement.

The applicant union appealed an Employment Standards Officer's decision denying termination pay to its former members.

The Board held a hearing and decided to bifurcate the proceedings.

The first phase will address the group's entitlement to termination pay and a constitutional question raised by Cara Operations Limited regarding federal undertaking jurisdiction.

The Board issued procedural directions and timelines for pleadings, evidence, and submissions.

The Service Employees International Union, Local 220 sought intervenor status in a matter between the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 333 and Leisure World Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed all parties to submit their positions on the intervention request by December 18, 2000, and deferred the determination of intervenor status to the scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed an application against the Crown in Right of Ontario and the Ontario Public Service Employees Union.

On consent of the parties, the Board adjourned the consultation scheduled for December 7, 2000, sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a previous Board decision to include a clarity note agreed to by the parties regarding the bargaining unit description, and to add the clarity note to the certificate.

The Board granted the request to vary the decision to include the clarity note, but declined to add it to the certificate as it is not the Board's practice to do so.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate.

A certificate was ordered to issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote in which more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

Pursuant to section 62 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, the intervenor union ceased to represent the employees in the bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.

A one-year bar on subsequent certification applications by the applicant was imposed.

The Christian Labour Association of Canada applied for certification to represent employees at Pioneer Long Term Care Center (Interim).

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a certificate to the applicant.

Pursuant to section 62 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, the intervenor union ceased to represent the employees in the bargaining unit.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a previous Board decision.

The Board reviewed the request and found that the applicant presented no new evidence, objections, or arguments that could not have been raised earlier.

Applying its general guidelines for reconsideration, the Board denied the request.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of Registered and Graduate Nurses employed by the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate.

The Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant union.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor union by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.

The application was unopposed by the responding party employer and the predecessor union.

The Board granted the application and issued the requested declaration.