Stephen Raymond

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots cast were in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further applications by the applicant for the same bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of maintenance employees at the responding party's facility.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Board found the unit appropriate for collective bargaining.

A certificate was ordered to issue to the applicant.

The applicant requested to withdraw the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant requested to withdraw her application against the Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 1110.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant, Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 3896, requested to withdraw its application against the responding parties.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of part-time employees and students at St. Joseph's General Hospital in Elliot Lake.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and the resolution of all representations, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the proposed bargaining unit appropriate for collective bargaining.

The Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant union.

A group of employees applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration terminating the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

The Board found the application timely and that at least forty percent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

However, due to the union's allegations that the application violated section 63(16) of the Act and was not brought by a proper individual, the Board ordered the ballot box sealed pending further order or agreement of the parties.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a brief decision amending paragraph 2 of its November 23, 2000 decision to correct the effective date of the collective agreement between the responding party and The Fort Erie Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals to January 1, 1999, until December 31, 2000.

The applicant union requested to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Based on the agreement of the parties regarding the appropriate bargaining unit and the membership evidence filed, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

The applicant union filed an application for certification to represent employees of Value Village Stores Inc. in Whitby.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Based on the agreement of the parties regarding the appropriate bargaining unit and the membership evidence filed, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

The applicant trade union applied for certification.

The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found the numerical difference was not significant and that the applicant established sufficient membership support to obtain a representation vote.

The Board directed a representation vote.

A dissenting board member would have directed the ballot box to be sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found that the proposed bargaining unit could be appropriate but could not be absolutely certain that the union had the requisite 40 percent membership support.

Consequently, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken and that the ballot box be sealed pending further order or agreement of the parties.

The applicant requested to withdraw her application against the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees at The Village Health Care Centre, who were currently represented by the intervenor.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support in its proposed bargaining unit to warrant a representation vote.

The Board directed that a representation vote be held, with voters asked to choose between the applicant and the intervenor.

The applicant applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

A representation vote was held, and more than fifty percent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in opposition to the union.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.

The applicant union requested to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor, the Canada Hair Cloth Employees’ Association, by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.

The application was unopposed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the declaration.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Construction Council of Ontario, requested to withdraw its application against the responding party, Montana Electric Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.