P. Darby

The Ontario Review Board conducted a mandatory annual review of the accused's Detention Disposition.

The accused, who was found not criminally responsible for assault causing bodily harm, has diagnoses of schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder.

Based on the hospital report, expert testimony, and a joint submission from the parties, the Board found that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to public safety.

The Board ordered the continuation of the Detention Disposition at the Secure Forensic Unit, with discretion to transfer to a General Forensic Unit as his condition improves.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition.

The accused, who suffers from treatment-refractory schizophrenia, was previously found unfit to stand trial on charges including arson and assault.

The Board found that the accused remains unfit to stand trial as his psychotic symptoms prevent him from having a reality-based understanding of the proceedings or communicating with counsel.

However, noting improvements in his behavioural control and impulse management, the Board ordered his transfer from a high-secure forensic hospital to a medium-secure facility, with privileges to access the community accompanied by staff.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review and a restriction of liberties review for an accused found not criminally responsible for uttering threats and possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose.

The accused, who suffers from schizoaffective disorder and substance use disorders, had been readmitted to the hospital after becoming disorganized and entering a stranger's car.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his fragile insight and risk of decompensation when non-adherent to medication.

The Board ordered the continuation of the current detention order and found the restriction of his liberties upon readmission to be necessary and appropriate.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for second-degree murder.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia and intellectual disability, had recently experienced physical health issues requiring reductions in antipsychotic medications, leading to increased aggression and impulsivity.

The Board accepted the joint recommendation of the parties, finding that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety.

The Board ordered the continuation of the current detention order without change, concluding it was the least onerous and least restrictive disposition necessary to manage his risk and medical needs.

The hospital notified the Ontario Review Board of a restriction of the accused's liberty lasting over seven days due to his placement in seclusion.

The accused, who was found not criminally responsible for assault with a weapon, became aggressive and uncooperative with staff, leading to his seclusion.

The Board held a hearing and found that the restriction of liberty was necessary and appropriate for the safety of the public and represented the least onerous and least restrictive measure available at the time it was imposed and throughout its duration.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for robbery and manslaughter and designated as a high-risk accused.

The Board found that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to public safety due to his treatment-refractory schizoaffective disorder and substance use disorders.

The Board ordered the continuation of his detention at a high-secure facility but amended the disposition to remove absences for 'compassionate' and 'legal' purposes to comply with the restrictions on high-risk accused under s. 672.64(3) of the Criminal Code.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory annual review hearing for an accused found not criminally responsible for arson.

The accused, who suffers from schizophrenia and an acquired brain injury, is currently detained at Waypoint Centre and awaiting transfer to CAMH.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to ongoing symptoms, limited response to treatment, and persistent sexualized behaviours.

The Board ordered the continuation of the current detention order and noted it lacks jurisdiction to compel CAMH to expedite the transfer absent a Charter application.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory hearing to review the disposition of the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for criminal harassment and other offences.

The hospital, the Attorney General, and the accused jointly submitted that the accused no longer posed a significant threat to public safety.

Relying on the hospital report and the testimony of the accused's treating physician, the Board found that the accused's mental health was stable, he was compliant with treatment, and he had robust protective factors.

The Board concluded the accused no longer represented a significant threat to the safety of the public and ordered an absolute discharge.

The Ontario Review Board held a hearing to review the restriction of liberty of the accused, who was secluded at a mental health facility for over a month following aggressive and non-compliant behaviour.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia, had been unmedicated and refused seclusion relief or communication with staff.

The Board found that the seclusion was a significant departure from his liberty norm but concluded it was necessary and appropriate for the safety of the public, representing the least onerous and least restrictive measure available at the time.

The Ontario Review Board held a hearing to review the disposition and fitness to stand trial of a youth accused of various offences including assault and weapons possession.

The youth, diagnosed with schizophrenia and mild intellectual disability, had been previously found unfit.

The Board found that the youth remains unfit to stand trial, as his cognitive processing and executive functioning remain impaired despite improvements from medication.

The Board ordered a Detention Order at the youth centre with privileges including community living in approved accommodation and seven-day accompanied travel passes, and directed the preparation of a Gladue Report.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition.

The accused, previously found not criminally responsible for arson and personating a peace officer, was subject to a detention order at a hospital.

The accused requested an amendment to allow the use of cannabis from a licensed dispensary.

The Board found that the accused remained a significant threat to public safety, noting a clear link between his substance use and worsening symptoms of psychosis, including agitation and paranoia.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention order with a strict prohibition on all substance use, including cannabis.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition following a finding of not criminally responsible for mischief and arson.

The accused, diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, had recently pled guilty to sexual assault and received a conditional sentence requiring him to remain in hospital.

The parties jointly submitted that the accused remained a significant threat to public safety.

The Board accepted the joint submission, finding that the accused's severe intractable mental disorder, residual symptoms, and risk of impulsive violence necessitated a continuation of the detention order on the same terms.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition.

The accused was previously found not criminally responsible for assault and uttering threats.

The parties agreed that the accused remained a significant threat to public safety due to his schizoaffective disorder, history of medication non-adherence, and risk of substance use.

The Board found that the accused required ongoing medication supervision and hospital-approved accommodation to remain stable.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention order.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition following a finding of not criminally responsible for assault and uttering threats.

The accused had been living in the community successfully and remained stable on medication for bipolar disorder.

All parties agreed that while the accused remained a significant threat to public safety, a detention order was no longer necessary.

The Board ordered a conditional discharge, adopting the hospital's recommended conditions but declining to impose a substance use prohibition as there was no history of substance use disorder.

The Ontario Review Board conducted an annual review of the accused's disposition pursuant to section 672.81(1) of the Criminal Code.

The accused was previously found not criminally responsible for firearms and uttering threats offences and was diagnosed with schizophrenia.

The Board found that the accused remained a significant threat to public safety due to his lack of insight, ongoing paranoia, and risk of medication non-compliance if discharged.

The Board ordered the continuation of the detention order on the same terms to support his gradual transition to community living.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory annual hearing to review the conditional discharge of the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for mischief and arson.

The accused has schizophrenia and a substance use disorder, both currently in remission.

The treatment team and all parties recommended continuing the conditional discharge but removing the condition requiring abstention from intoxicants, as the accused had been abstinent for five years and compliant with treatment.

The Board found the accused still posed a significant threat to public safety but agreed that the proposed disposition was the least onerous and least restrictive option.

The conditional discharge was continued with the abstention condition removed.

The Ontario Review Board held a mandatory annual review hearing for an accused previously found not criminally responsible for attempted murder.

The accused, diagnosed with schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder, had been residing in the community under a detention order.

The Board found that the accused continues to pose a significant threat to public safety due to his fragile mental health and limited insight.

However, accepting the joint submission of the parties, the Board concluded that a conditional discharge was the least onerous and least restrictive disposition necessary, as the provisions of the Mental Health Act would be sufficient to manage his risk in the community.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for an accused previously found not criminally responsible for attempted murder.

The accused suffers from a complex personality disorder and has a history of substance use.

The Board found that the accused continues to represent a significant threat to the safety of the public due to poor insight, risk of substance-induced psychosis, and ongoing need for monitoring.

The Board ordered the continuation of the current detention order without change to its terms.

The Ontario Review Board held a hearing to determine the fitness and disposition of the accused, who was previously found unfit to stand trial on charges including break and enter and theft.

Based on the uncontradicted psychiatric evidence, the Board found that the accused remained unfit to stand trial due to a severe thought disorder stemming from schizophrenia.

The Board ordered a detention order as the necessary and appropriate disposition, noting the accused's history of homelessness and non-compliance with treatment, but declined to impose a condition prohibiting the use of intoxicating substances due to a lack of evidence of substance abuse.

The Ontario Review Board held an annual review hearing for the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for arson and other offences.

The accused had been living in the community without readmission since 2021, demonstrating good insight into his schizoaffective disorder and substance use issues.

All parties, including the hospital and the Attorney General, jointly submitted that the accused no longer posed a significant threat to public safety.

The Board agreed and ordered an absolute discharge.