Who is Patricia McQuaid?

Patricia McQuaid is a vice-chair at the Condominium Authority Tribunal with 672 decisions on record from 2007 to 2026. Key areas include other tribunals, administrative law, real estate law.

What tribunal does Patricia McQuaid sit on?

Patricia McQuaid has sat on Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario and Ontario Licence Appeal Tribunal and Condominium Authority Tribunal and Ontario Fire Safety Commission and Ontario Animal Care Review Board.

What areas of law does Patricia McQuaid decide?

Patricia McQuaid's most common areas include Other Tribunals (641 decisions), Administrative Law (588 decisions), Real Estate Law (78 decisions). Patricia McQuaid has handled 672 decisions across 7 areas.

How many decisions has Patricia McQuaid made?

Patricia McQuaid has 672 decisions on record from 2007 to 2026 across 5 tribunals.

Who frequently appears before Patricia McQuaid?

Representatives who frequently appear before Patricia McQuaid include Richard Kulis, Richard Kulis, Phillip Morris.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Other Tribunals

Administrative Law

Real Estate Law

Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule matters (SABS)

Human Rights

Construction Law

Civil Litigation - Plaintiff

Patricia McQuaid

Vice-Chair·Condominium Authority Tribunal·Since 2007

OCAT OACRB OFSC AGCO OLAT

672

cases · 20 yrs · AGCO, OLAT, OCAT, OFSC, OACRB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-Chair· 391Vice-Chair· 136Vice-Chair· 34Vice Chair· 28Vice-Chair, AGCO· 19VICE -CHAIR· 11Member· 9Vice-Chair· 8

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalMar 19, 2026

Application regarding condominium elevator maintenance dismissed as the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction over repair and maintenance disputes.

The applicant, a unit owner, filed an application with the Condominium Authority Tribunal alleging that the respondent condominium corporation breached its maintenance obligations under the Condominium Act, 1998 due to chronic elevator failures.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because it lacks jurisdiction over repair and maintenance disputes under sections 89-92 of the Act.

As the applicant did not respond to the Notice, the Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19.1(c) of its Rules of Practice.

Julien v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2338, 2026 ONCAT 52

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalFeb 18, 2026

Nuisance application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as faulty ventilation is a building condition, not an activity.

The applicant, a condominium unit owner, filed a nuisance application against the condominium corporation, alleging that a faulty ventilation system was causing odour and smoke in their unit.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, noting that its jurisdiction over nuisances under the Condominium Act requires an activity by a person, not a building condition.

The Tribunal found it lacked legal authority to hear the dispute, as the issue related to the corporation's repair obligations rather than a prescribed nuisance.

The application was dismissed.

Roe v. Oxford Condominium Corporation No. 28, 2026 ONCAT 27

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalFeb 11, 2026

Condominium tribunal application regarding a basketball net dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The applicant, a unit owner, filed a nuisance application with the Condominium Authority Tribunal against the respondent condominium corporation regarding a request to remove a portable basketball net.

The Tribunal returned the application, noting it lacked jurisdiction under the Condominium Act, 1998 and O. Reg. 179/17, and asked the applicant to identify a relevant provision.

The applicant resubmitted without updating the application.

After the applicant failed to respond to a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, the Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction.

Lacuna v. York Condominium Corporation No.489, 2026 ONCAT 23

Benjamin Rutherford

In Private Practice7 cases2021–2025

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalDec 17, 2025

Tribunal application withdrawn and case closed following resolution of issues between the parties.

The applicant filed an application with the Condominium Authority Tribunal.

Prior to a decision, the applicant informed the Tribunal that the parties had resolved the issues in dispute and requested to withdraw the case.

The Tribunal accepted the withdrawal and ordered the case closed pursuant to Rule 43.1 of the Tribunal's Rules of Practice.

Smirnov v. York Region Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1253, 2025 ONCAT 215

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalDec 5, 2025

Consent order issued requiring condominium corporation to provide requested records regarding a plumbing chargeback.

The applicant submitted a request for condominium records relating to a plumbing chargeback.

The parties agreed to settle the issues by way of a consent order.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal ordered the respondent to provide the requested records, including board materials, a plumber's report, and board minutes, to the applicant at no cost.

No penalty or costs were awarded.

Lee v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2788, 2025 ONCAT 208

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalNov 26, 2025

Condominium Tribunal dismissed harassment application for lack of jurisdiction as conduct did not constitute legal nuisance.

The applicant, a condominium unit owner, filed an application with the Condominium Authority Tribunal alleging that the respondent, another unit owner and board member, was harassing her through derogatory statements, unsolicited emails, and yelling.

The applicant argued this conduct constituted a nuisance under section 117(2) of the Condominium Act.

The Tribunal dismissed the application under Rule 19 of its Rules of Practice, finding that it lacked jurisdiction to hear disputes primarily about harassment or governance issues between board members, as the alleged conduct did not meet the legal threshold for a nuisance under the Act or the corporation's rules.

French v. LaBatte, 2025 ONCAT 195

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalNov 19, 2025

Condominium owner ordered to clean unit to eliminate unreasonable odour constituting a nuisance.

The applicant condominium corporation applied to the Condominium Authority Tribunal regarding unreasonable odours emanating from the respondent owner's unit due to hoarding and garbage accumulation.

The respondent did not participate in the hearing.

The Tribunal found that the respondent's activities constituted a nuisance under s. 117(2) of the Condominium Act, 1998.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to clean the unit within 30 days, failing which the corporation may enter and hire a third-party cleaner at the respondent's expense.

The corporation was also awarded $750 in compensation and $1,200 in costs.

Oxford Condominium Corporation No. 24 v. Post, 2025 ONCAT 192

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalSep 2, 2025

Condominium application disputing key fob chargeback dismissed for lack of jurisdiction over building security rules.

The applicant filed an application disputing an $800 chargeback issued by the respondent condominium corporation after a non-resident used the applicant's key fob.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, noting the dispute concerned building access and security rules rather than parking or storage.

The applicant argued the fob also granted access to parking, bringing it within the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The Tribunal rejected this argument, finding the rules were in substance about building security, which falls outside its statutory jurisdiction under O. Reg. 179/17.

The application was dismissed.

Kalesoski v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2629, 2025 ONCAT 150

Justin McLarty

In Private Practice25 cases2021–2025

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalAug 22, 2025

Application alleging condominium corporation breached noise settlement agreement dismissed for lack of contravention.

The applicant unit owner applied to the Condominium Authority Tribunal alleging that the respondent condominium corporation breached a settlement agreement regarding noise complaints from the unit above.

The agreement required the corporation to hire a sound engineer and implement reasonable recommendations for common element noise issues.

The Tribunal found that the corporation complied with the agreement, as the engineer's report found the floor assembly sufficient and only recommended the upstairs neighbour install area rugs, which the corporation had no authority to enforce.

The application was dismissed without costs.

Sooknanan v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 872, 2025 ONCAT 144

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalAug 13, 2025

Application dismissed; operation of condominium mechanical systems is not an 'activity' under s. 117(2).

The applicant condominium owner applied to the Condominium Authority Tribunal alleging that the ongoing operation of the building's mechanical systems caused unreasonable noise and vibration, constituting a nuisance under s. 117(2) of the Condominium Act, 1998.

The Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal held that the regular operation of a building's mechanical systems is a condition of the property, not an 'activity' carried on by a person within the meaning of s. 117(2).

Subedi v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2264, 2025 ONCAT 134

Justin McLarty

In Private Practice25 cases2021–2025

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalJun 18, 2025

Condominium owner ordered to comply with pet and noise rules; legal costs denied as owner vacated.

The applicant condominium corporation sought an order against the respondent unit owner for violating rules regarding pets, balcony use, and noise.

The respondent, who had vacated the unit prior to the hearing, did not participate.

The Tribunal found that the respondent breached the rules by failing to clean up dog excrement and cigarette butts on his balcony, which interfered with the neighbour below, and by creating unreasonable noise during domestic disputes.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to comply with the rules if he returns to the unit and awarded $150 in Tribunal fees to the applicant, but denied the applicant's claim for over $7,000 in legal costs because pursuing the hearing after the respondent vacated was unreasonable.

Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2143 v. Kara, 2025 ONCAT 103

Jeremy Kirk

In Private Practice10 cases2023–2026

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalJun 4, 2025

Condominium owner ordered to permanently remove dog after allowing it to defecate on balcony.

The applicant condominium corporation sought an order for the permanent removal of the respondent's dog, alleging the respondent allowed the dog to defecate on her balcony and washed the waste onto the balcony below, creating a nuisance.

The respondent failed to participate in the hearing.

The Tribunal found the respondent violated the condominium's rules regarding pets and nuisance.

The Tribunal ordered the permanent removal of the dog within 30 days and awarded $200 in costs for the filing fee, but declined to award the requested legal costs on a full indemnity basis.

Thunder Bay Condominium Corporation No. 25 v. Foster, 2025 ONCAT 94

Rod Escayola

3 cases2023–2025

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalMay 28, 2025

Condominium records request fulfilled; applicant awarded Tribunal fees due to corporation's delayed response.

The applicant, a condominium unit owner, submitted a request for records related to a garage membrane project and other expenditures.

The respondent condominium corporation provided some records late and argued the applicant was on a fishing expedition.

The Tribunal found the applicant was not on a fishing expedition but concluded the respondent had provided all the records it was required to keep.

The applicant was awarded $200 in Tribunal fees due to the respondent's delay in providing the initial records.

de Francesco v. Ottawa Carleton Leasehold Condominium Corporation No. 973, 2025 ONCAT 84

Angad Singh

In Private Practice11 cases2024–2026

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalApr 25, 2025

Condominium records request dismissed as the requested records either did not exist or were not corporate records.

The applicant, a condominium unit owner, sought various records from the respondent condominium corporation, including AGM video recordings, an LED lighting rebate application, and security video footage of an altercation with the property manager.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal found that the requested records either did not exist, were not records of the corporation, or had already been provided.

Consequently, there was no refusal to provide records without a reasonable excuse.

However, because some records from an earlier request were only provided during mediation, the Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay $75 in costs to the applicant.

Khan v. Peel Condominium Corporation No. 409, 2025 ONCAT 67

Natalia Polis

55 cases2019–2026

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalMar 18, 2025

Condominium noise complaint dismissed as exit door sound was not objectively unreasonable.

The applicant, a condominium unit owner, sought an order directing the condominium corporation to resolve noise issues caused by an exit door near her unit.

She alleged the door's use created unreasonable noise constituting a nuisance under s. 117(2) of the Condominium Act.

The Tribunal found that while the door was not quiet, the noise was not objectively unreasonable and was consistent with normal communal living.

The Tribunal also found the corporation had taken reasonable steps to address the complaints within the constraints of the Fire Code.

The application was dismissed without costs.

Seif v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1511, 2025 ONCAT 48

Emily Deng

9 cases2021–2025

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalMar 4, 2025

Tribunal lacks jurisdiction over electric vehicle charging dispute where governing documents do not regulate the issue.

The applicant condominium owner filed an application regarding the respondent condominium corporation's decision to cut off power to an electrical outlet at his designated parking spot, which he used to charge his hybrid vehicle.

The respondent brought a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal found that the dispute did not fall within its jurisdiction under s. 1(1)(d) of O. Reg. 179/17, as there were no provisions in the corporation's governing documents that specifically governed automobiles or parking in relation to the electrical outlets.

The application was dismissed.

Gilmour v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 93, 2025 ONCAT 37

Sonja Hodis

In Private Practice20 cases2009–2025

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalMar 3, 2025

Condominium noise application dismissed; creaking floors from normal walking do not constitute unreasonable noise.

The applicant unit owner alleged that the respondent unit owner above him was creating unreasonable noise contrary to s. 117(2) of the Condominium Act, and sought an order for the condominium corporation to repair the subfloor.

The Tribunal found that the noises were creaking sounds caused by normal walking and the building's construction, not by any unreasonable activity.

The application was dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay $2,500 in costs to the condominium corporation.

Mishibinijima v. Sapsford, Simcoe Condominium Corporation No. 60, 2025 ONCAT 36

Maria Dimakas

In Private Practice17 cases2010–2026

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalJan 16, 2025

Condominium rule prohibiting utility trailers and limiting parking spaces was validly enacted and reasonable.

The applicant, a commercial unit owner, challenged the validity of a new parking rule enacted by the condominium corporation that prohibited the parking of utility trailers and limited owners to two parking spaces in front of their units.

The applicant argued the rule was unreasonable and inconsistent with the declaration, which provided for 'first come, first served' parking.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal found that the board followed the required statutory process for enacting the rule and that the rule was a reasonable response to complaints about parking spaces being used for storage.

The Tribunal concluded the rule was valid and consistent with the declaration, dismissing the application without costs.

1199831 Ontario Ltd v. Halton Standard Condominium Corporation No. 732, 2025 ONCAT 9

Tony Bui

In Private Practice25 cases2019–2026

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalDec 30, 2024

Tribunal application closed following confidential settlement agreement between the parties.

The applicant filed an application with the Condominium Authority Tribunal.

The parties subsequently reached a private and confidential settlement agreement that resolved the issues in dispute.

Pursuant to Rule 43.1(b) of the CAT's Rules of Practice, the Tribunal ordered the case closed and directed that all documents and messages shared during the negotiation and mediation stages remain private and confidential.

Krepel v. York Region Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1253, 2024 ONCAT 194

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalNov 19, 2024

Condominium nuisance application regarding cooking odours dismissed for lack of evidence.

The applicant, a condominium owner, alleged that the respondents, owners of the unit below, permitted activities causing unreasonable cooking odours in his unit, contrary to s. 117(2) of the Condominium Act, 1998.

The applicant provided little evidence to substantiate the claim, while the respondents provided evidence of HVAC inspections showing proper ventilation.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal found insufficient evidence to establish that the odours were unreasonable or constituted a nuisance.

The application was dismissed without costs.

Choi v. Lacerona, Tolentino, 2024 ONCAT 170

applicant_counsel

Katya UkrainetzCounsel
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance

assistance for the Licensee

Alice FengAgent
1 appearance

assisted the Licensee's Representative

Rob GilroyAgent
1 appearance

assisting the Licensee

Paul MillerAgent
1 appearance

Counsel

Joy MathewsCounsel
1 appearance
Justin McLartyCounsel
1 appearance
Megan MackeyCounsel
1 appearance
Natalia PolisCounsel
1 appearance
Emily DengCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Registrar

Richard KulisCounsel
1 appearance

for 1779145 Ontario Inc.

Jerry LevitanCounsel
1 appearance

for Aijia Li

Peter CopelandCounsel
1 appearance

for Clarke Chevrolet Buick GMC Ltd. and Andrew J. Clarke

Gregory G. GoulinCounsel
1 appearance

for Councillor Adam Giambrone

Chris GallopAgent
1 appearance

for herself

Julie BuckareffSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself and on behalf of the Objectors

Rosemary UllyotSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Misha GloubermanSelf-represented
2 appearances
John Bradley OrgarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randy KerrSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and the Resident Objectors

Sam SilverstoneSelf-represented
1 appearance

for James A. Clarke and Heather R. Clarke

Julian PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for Milagros Tolentino

Lewis LaceronaAgent
1 appearance

for Randy Kerr

William RobertsCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Rushlow

Andrew OstromCounsel
1 appearance

for Simcoe Condominium Corporation No. 60

Sonja HodisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Added Party

Eric DenOudenAgent
1 appearance
Charles WagmanCounsel
1 appearance
Rachel PilcCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica BraunCounsel
1 appearance
Scott NowoselskiCounsel
1 appearance
Jo-Anne BarnardAgent
1 appearance
Ron ProtockyAgent
1 appearance
Kevin ScullionCounsel
1 appearance
J. Daniel McConvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Justin JakubiakCounsel
3 appearances
Ed BlahaParalegal
2 appearances
Jerry LevitanCounsel
2 appearances
Troy KaterenchukAgent
1 appearance
John RoxonAgent
1 appearance
Naresh MandaviaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Harry PerlisCounsel
1 appearance
Murray SniderCounsel
1 appearance
10549Self-represented
1 appearance
Valeria SciclunaSelf-represented
1 appearance
N.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Vartan ManoukianParalegal
1 appearance
Jessica CanivetSelf-represented
1 appearance
Julie TremblaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Sontauna RapschParalegal
1 appearance
9626Self-represented
1 appearance
Saba AhmadCounsel
1 appearance
Gul TanisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajan MahavalirajanParalegal
1 appearance
Melanie BlaisSelf-represented
1 appearance

For the Appellant

AppellantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
Abdul MajeedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter EberhardCounsel
1 appearance
Noel GerryCounsel
1 appearance
Robert SindingCounsel
1 appearance
Justin JakubiakCounsel
1 appearance
Justin M. JakubiakCounsel
1 appearance
IOSelf-represented
1 appearance
One of the AppellantsSelf-represented
1 appearance
KLSelf-represented
1 appearance
E.C.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the applicant

Vu NguyenAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

David WinerAgent
4 appearances
Darlene MezzabottaParalegal
2 appearances
Kavita BoodramSelf-represented
2 appearances
Andrew FranzkeCounsel
2 appearances
Robert PlouffeAgent
2 appearances
Gareth StackhouseCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SievewrightSelf-represented
2 appearances
XianChen AnCounsel
2 appearances
Randall BarrsAgent
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Megan MackeyCounsel
2 appearances
Anna IordanidiAgent
1 appearance
Charles MontgomeryAgent
1 appearance
Anna WyszomierskaAgent
1 appearance
Douglas ForsytheAgent
1 appearance
Lauren EsquivelAgent
1 appearance
Lorie HawleyAgent
1 appearance
Seema AhmadAgent
1 appearance
Li YangSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shane KelfordAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant 2109889 Ontario Inc.

Carl CassellAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Mushtaq Khan

Mushtaq KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

Symon ZuckerCounsel
2 appearances
Michael SimaanCounsel
1 appearance
Yulia PesinCounsel
1 appearance
Robin SpinksCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah MolyneauxCounsel
1 appearance
Monica CaceresAgent
1 appearance
Mark ReynoldsAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Cambridge

John CosmanAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Ray KallioAgent
4 appearances
Ray KallioCounsel
4 appearances
Jessica BraunAgent
3 appearances
Kelly MatsumotoCounsel
2 appearances
Mark CrawfordCounsel
1 appearance
Debbie CamiloAgent
1 appearance
Mark CrawfordAgent
1 appearance
Jessica BrownAgent
1 appearance
Jessica BraunCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah O'ConnorAgent
1 appearance

for the Condominium

Sonia KociperAgent
1 appearance

for the corporate licensee

Peter KavidasSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kuldeep SinghSelf-represented
2 appearances
Adam VassosCounsel
2 appearances
Boris KravetsAgent
1 appearance
John G. WilsonAgent
1 appearance
Richard KnottAgent
1 appearance
James BarkeyAgent
1 appearance
Anthony BarileCounsel
1 appearance
Spiro BoulierisSelf-represented
1 appearance
John VitulliCounsel
1 appearance
Dale HillAgent
1 appearance
Fadi HakimAgent
1 appearance
Ron FritzCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce OlmsteadCounsel
1 appearance
Clyde SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Rino YagamiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BarileCounsel
1 appearance
Flavio BattistonCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffrey AyotteAgent
1 appearance
Randall BarrsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporate Licensee

Randall BarrsCounsel
2 appearances
Jerry LevitanAgent
1 appearance
Noel GerryCounsel
1 appearance
Louis RajnauthAgent
1 appearance
Christopher MorrisAgent
1 appearance
Jerry LevitanCounsel
1 appearance
John LineAgent
1 appearance
Ron FritzAgent
1 appearance
Cheryl NedrickAgent
1 appearance
Suvendiran PoopalasinghamAgent
1 appearance

for the Corporate Licensee and of Sritharan Mylvaganam and Eesan Subramaniam

Jerry LevitanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation

Wesley BuchnerAgent
1 appearance
Allen QiangAgent
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jessica BraunCounsel
2 appearances
Jo-Anne HainesAgent
1 appearance
Roger BobakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ray KallioCounsel
1 appearance
Nellie SnowballAgent
1 appearance
Joe MurphySelf-represented
1 appearance
Kevin KokCounsel
1 appearance

for the King-Spadina Resident's Association

Wayne ScottAgent
1 appearance

for the King-Spadina Residents Association

Wayne ScottAgent
2 appearances
Don RodbardAgent
1 appearance

for the licence holder

Jerry LevitanCounsel
2 appearances
John S. FregeauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Licence Holder

Emilio BiscegliaCounsel
2 appearances
David WinerCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher WuAgent
1 appearance

for the licensee

Noel GerryCounsel
1 appearance
Mr. MariniCounsel
1 appearance
Son NguyenAgent
1 appearance
Sucha Singh MokhaAgent
1 appearance
Kevin DavisCounsel
1 appearance
Quang DuongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Calvin BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Sucha Singh MokhaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom MalakosAgent
1 appearance

for the Licensee

Jerry LevitanAgent
18 appearances
Jerry LevitanCounsel
17 appearances
Randall BarrsCounsel
17 appearances
Adam VassosCounsel
10 appearances
Richard ElbirtAgent
5 appearances
Harvey DennisAgent
5 appearances
Jerry HerszkopfAgent
5 appearances
Greg BurdAgent
4 appearances
Michele KhitabAgent
4 appearances
Mike FigolAgent
4 appearances
Noel GerryCounsel
3 appearances
Adam VassosAgent
3 appearances
Patrick LittleAgent
3 appearances
Patrick AllenSelf-represented
3 appearances
Randall BarrsAgent
3 appearances
John ParkCounsel
2 appearances
Pradeep ChandCounsel
2 appearances
Norman GrootCounsel
2 appearances
Chris StevensAgent
2 appearances
Ashok KumarAgent
2 appearances

for the Licensee and the Transfer Applicant

Marc KoplowitzCounsel
1 appearance

for the licensees

Fouad HakeemSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Licensees

Kenji TsujinakaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Microsonic Group of Companies

Jerry LevitanAgent
1 appearance

for the Objector

Wayne ScottAgent
3 appearances
Donald RodbardAgent
1 appearance
David AstSelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela BurnsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey WagnerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter ShoebridgeAgent
1 appearance

for the Objectors

Ibie DemirdacheSelf-represented
1 appearance
Terrie-Lynne DevonishSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dennis MontpetitSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Registrant

John LeeCounsel
3 appearances
Barry WadsworthCounsel
2 appearances
Barry WadsworthAgent
2 appearances
Lisa Marie HickenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carol KirwanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Xiang Gui ZengSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jennifer HueAgent
1 appearance
Sevag YeghoyanAgent
1 appearance
Tharsan SribalanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael CarolineCounsel
1 appearance
Paul GolianCounsel
1 appearance

for the Registrar

Richard KulisCounsel
61 appearances
Richard KulisAgent
48 appearances
Phillip MorrisAgent
43 appearances
Phillip MorrisCounsel
40 appearances
Sujin ChanAgent
33 appearances
Joyce TaylorAgent
30 appearances
Bryna KaplanCounsel
26 appearances
Daniel AlakasAgent
17 appearances
Joyce TaylorCounsel
15 appearances
Sujin ChanCounsel
11 appearances
Brad AltonCounsel
11 appearances
Rena KhanAgent
10 appearances
Daniel AlakasCounsel
8 appearances
Rena KhanCounsel
7 appearances
Aviva HarariAgent
6 appearances
Dan AlakasAgent
5 appearances
Tamara BrooksAgent
5 appearances
Bryna KaplanAgent
4 appearances
Lorenzo PolicelliCounsel
3 appearances
Brad AltonAgent
3 appearances

for the Registrar, Alcohol and Gaming Commission

Phillip MorrisAgent
1 appearance
Dan AlakasAgent
1 appearance
Brad AltonAgent
1 appearance
Rena KhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Registrar of Motor Vehicles

Nora ChallisCounsel
1 appearance

for the resident objectors

Alvaro MallarinoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Resident Objectors

Graham JohnSelf-represented
1 appearance
Amanda JohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Rena KhanCounsel
10 appearances
Aviva HarariCounsel
5 appearances
Tamara BrooksCounsel
4 appearances
Kevin LockwoodAgent
4 appearances
Stella VelocciAgent
4 appearances
Michael RusekCounsel
4 appearances
Sonia De SantisAgent
4 appearances
Kate VarvaParalegal
4 appearances
Sanjay KapurAgent
3 appearances
Soussanna KarasCounsel
3 appearances
Victor YeeCounsel
2 appearances
Danielle PeckCounsel
2 appearances
Joyce TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Elizabeth MaishlishCounsel
2 appearances
Maya SabharwalCounsel
2 appearances
Brian M. YungCounsel
2 appearances
Patrick MooreCounsel
2 appearances
Zahir AliCounsel
2 appearances
Connie MalloryAgent
2 appearances
Gena ArgitisCounsel
1 appearance

For the Respondent

Steve GrootenboerAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Halton Standard Condominium Corporation No. 617

Jen DiasAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 872

Justin McLartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Poonam Dutta

Ian ShemeshParalegal
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Bree PierceCounsel
2 appearances
Barbara LakatosSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tae Ryung ChoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mi-Sug ParkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel GreanyaParalegal
1 appearance
Carol DirksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Silvia Yamine

Silvia YamineSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the transfer applicant

Can Zhong YaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2680

Natalia PolisCounsel
1 appearance

for TriCounty Addiction Services

Sara HammelAgent
1 appearance

for Xie Lie

Patrice BandCounsel
1 appearance

Objector/Party to the proceedings

Joe ArrudaSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of the licensee

Ravi CheemanlallAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Licensee

Cindy DouAgent
1 appearance

on her own behalf and on behalf of the objectors

Vula KawalezSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf and on behalf of the Corporate Licensee

JianPing ZhouSelf-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf and on behalf of the objectors

Ahmed BhaiyatSelf-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf and on behalf of the Objectors

Chris DeVitaSelf-represented
1 appearance

party to the proceeding

Stan KozakSelf-represented
1 appearance

principal of licensee

Barry AlperSelf-represented
1 appearance

Registrar's Representative

Richard KulisCounsel
1 appearance

respondent_counsel

Self-representedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ann PipeCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Houman MortazaviSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-Represented

David D. BucklandSelf-represented
1 appearance

The Applicant

Mohit BaliSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gianni de FrancescoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter ChoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sonia Mills-MinsterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ney CalderonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stella KowalchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Somkith ChaiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kamana SubediSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret Ann BogueSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steve MishibinijimaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SeifSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marc JulienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sarah FrenchSelf-represented
1 appearance

The Respondent

Margaret ReaAgent
1 appearance
Peter LessardAgent
1 appearance
Temesgen TirfeAgent
1 appearance
Rod EscayolaCounsel
1 appearance
Carolyn LaBatteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Luis HernandezCounsel
1 appearance
Clarence ClarkeAgent
1 appearance
John De VellisCounsel
1 appearance
Giancarlo MoscaAgent
1 appearance

The Respondents

Lewis LaceronaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christine SapsfordSelf-represented
1 appearance

672

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

2.9

cases/mo

AGCO429(64%)

OLAT160(24%)

OCAT74(11%)

OFSC6(1%)

OACRB3(0%)

Decision types

trial

295

motion

229

appeal

146

costs

/Adjudicator

Patricia McQuaid — Vice-Chair

Other Tribunals

Administrative Law

Real Estate Law

Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule matters (SABS)

Human Rights

Construction Law

Civil Litigation - Plaintiff

Patricia McQuaid

Vice-Chair·Condominium Authority Tribunal·Since 2007

OCAT OACRB OFSC AGCO OLAT

672

cases · 20 yrs · AGCO, OLAT, OCAT, OFSC, OACRB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-Chair· 391Vice-Chair· 136Vice-Chair· 34Vice Chair· 28Vice-Chair, AGCO· 19VICE -CHAIR· 11Member· 9Vice-Chair· 8

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalMar 19, 2026

Application regarding condominium elevator maintenance dismissed as the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction over repair and maintenance disputes.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because it lacks jurisdiction over repair and maintenance disputes under sections 89-92 of the Act.

As the applicant did not respond to the Notice, the Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19.1(c) of its Rules of Practice.

Julien v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2338, 2026 ONCAT 52

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalFeb 18, 2026

Nuisance application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as faulty ventilation is a building condition, not an activity.

The applicant, a condominium unit owner, filed a nuisance application against the condominium corporation, alleging that a faulty ventilation system was causing odour and smoke in their unit.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, noting that its jurisdiction over nuisances under the Condominium Act requires an activity by a person, not a building condition.

The Tribunal found it lacked legal authority to hear the dispute, as the issue related to the corporation's repair obligations rather than a prescribed nuisance.

The application was dismissed.

Roe v. Oxford Condominium Corporation No. 28, 2026 ONCAT 27

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalFeb 11, 2026

Condominium tribunal application regarding a basketball net dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal returned the application, noting it lacked jurisdiction under the Condominium Act, 1998 and O. Reg. 179/17, and asked the applicant to identify a relevant provision.

The applicant resubmitted without updating the application.

After the applicant failed to respond to a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, the Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction.

Lacuna v. York Condominium Corporation No.489, 2026 ONCAT 23

Benjamin Rutherford

In Private Practice7 cases2021–2025

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalDec 17, 2025

Tribunal application withdrawn and case closed following resolution of issues between the parties.

The applicant filed an application with the Condominium Authority Tribunal.

Prior to a decision, the applicant informed the Tribunal that the parties had resolved the issues in dispute and requested to withdraw the case.

The Tribunal accepted the withdrawal and ordered the case closed pursuant to Rule 43.1 of the Tribunal's Rules of Practice.

Smirnov v. York Region Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1253, 2025 ONCAT 215

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalDec 5, 2025

Consent order issued requiring condominium corporation to provide requested records regarding a plumbing chargeback.

The applicant submitted a request for condominium records relating to a plumbing chargeback.

The parties agreed to settle the issues by way of a consent order.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal ordered the respondent to provide the requested records, including board materials, a plumber's report, and board minutes, to the applicant at no cost.

No penalty or costs were awarded.

Lee v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2788, 2025 ONCAT 208

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalNov 26, 2025

Condominium Tribunal dismissed harassment application for lack of jurisdiction as conduct did not constitute legal nuisance.

The applicant argued this conduct constituted a nuisance under section 117(2) of the Condominium Act.

French v. LaBatte, 2025 ONCAT 195

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalNov 19, 2025

Condominium owner ordered to clean unit to eliminate unreasonable odour constituting a nuisance.

The applicant condominium corporation applied to the Condominium Authority Tribunal regarding unreasonable odours emanating from the respondent owner's unit due to hoarding and garbage accumulation.

The respondent did not participate in the hearing.

The Tribunal found that the respondent's activities constituted a nuisance under s. 117(2) of the Condominium Act, 1998.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to clean the unit within 30 days, failing which the corporation may enter and hire a third-party cleaner at the respondent's expense.

The corporation was also awarded $750 in compensation and $1,200 in costs.

Oxford Condominium Corporation No. 24 v. Post, 2025 ONCAT 192

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalSep 2, 2025

Condominium application disputing key fob chargeback dismissed for lack of jurisdiction over building security rules.

The applicant filed an application disputing an $800 chargeback issued by the respondent condominium corporation after a non-resident used the applicant's key fob.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, noting the dispute concerned building access and security rules rather than parking or storage.

The applicant argued the fob also granted access to parking, bringing it within the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The Tribunal rejected this argument, finding the rules were in substance about building security, which falls outside its statutory jurisdiction under O. Reg. 179/17.

The application was dismissed.

Kalesoski v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2629, 2025 ONCAT 150

Justin McLarty

In Private Practice25 cases2021–2025

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalAug 22, 2025

Application alleging condominium corporation breached noise settlement agreement dismissed for lack of contravention.

The agreement required the corporation to hire a sound engineer and implement reasonable recommendations for common element noise issues.

The application was dismissed without costs.

Sooknanan v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 872, 2025 ONCAT 144

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalAug 13, 2025

Application dismissed; operation of condominium mechanical systems is not an 'activity' under s. 117(2).

The Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal held that the regular operation of a building's mechanical systems is a condition of the property, not an 'activity' carried on by a person within the meaning of s. 117(2).

Subedi v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2264, 2025 ONCAT 134

Justin McLarty

In Private Practice25 cases2021–2025

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalJun 18, 2025

Condominium owner ordered to comply with pet and noise rules; legal costs denied as owner vacated.

The applicant condominium corporation sought an order against the respondent unit owner for violating rules regarding pets, balcony use, and noise.

The respondent, who had vacated the unit prior to the hearing, did not participate.

Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2143 v. Kara, 2025 ONCAT 103

Jeremy Kirk

In Private Practice10 cases2023–2026

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalJun 4, 2025

Condominium owner ordered to permanently remove dog after allowing it to defecate on balcony.

The respondent failed to participate in the hearing.

The Tribunal found the respondent violated the condominium's rules regarding pets and nuisance.

The Tribunal ordered the permanent removal of the dog within 30 days and awarded $200 in costs for the filing fee, but declined to award the requested legal costs on a full indemnity basis.

Thunder Bay Condominium Corporation No. 25 v. Foster, 2025 ONCAT 94

Rod Escayola

3 cases2023–2025

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalMay 28, 2025

Condominium records request fulfilled; applicant awarded Tribunal fees due to corporation's delayed response.

The applicant, a condominium unit owner, submitted a request for records related to a garage membrane project and other expenditures.

The respondent condominium corporation provided some records late and argued the applicant was on a fishing expedition.

The Tribunal found the applicant was not on a fishing expedition but concluded the respondent had provided all the records it was required to keep.

The applicant was awarded $200 in Tribunal fees due to the respondent's delay in providing the initial records.

de Francesco v. Ottawa Carleton Leasehold Condominium Corporation No. 973, 2025 ONCAT 84

Angad Singh

In Private Practice11 cases2024–2026

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalApr 25, 2025

Condominium records request dismissed as the requested records either did not exist or were not corporate records.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal found that the requested records either did not exist, were not records of the corporation, or had already been provided.

Consequently, there was no refusal to provide records without a reasonable excuse.

However, because some records from an earlier request were only provided during mediation, the Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay $75 in costs to the applicant.

Khan v. Peel Condominium Corporation No. 409, 2025 ONCAT 67

Natalia Polis

55 cases2019–2026

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalMar 18, 2025

Condominium noise complaint dismissed as exit door sound was not objectively unreasonable.

The applicant, a condominium unit owner, sought an order directing the condominium corporation to resolve noise issues caused by an exit door near her unit.

She alleged the door's use created unreasonable noise constituting a nuisance under s. 117(2) of the Condominium Act.

The Tribunal found that while the door was not quiet, the noise was not objectively unreasonable and was consistent with normal communal living.

The Tribunal also found the corporation had taken reasonable steps to address the complaints within the constraints of the Fire Code.

The application was dismissed without costs.

Seif v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1511, 2025 ONCAT 48

Emily Deng

9 cases2021–2025

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalMar 4, 2025

Tribunal lacks jurisdiction over electric vehicle charging dispute where governing documents do not regulate the issue.

The respondent brought a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The application was dismissed.

Gilmour v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 93, 2025 ONCAT 37

Sonja Hodis

In Private Practice20 cases2009–2025

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalMar 3, 2025

Condominium noise application dismissed; creaking floors from normal walking do not constitute unreasonable noise.

The Tribunal found that the noises were creaking sounds caused by normal walking and the building's construction, not by any unreasonable activity.

The application was dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay $2,500 in costs to the condominium corporation.

Mishibinijima v. Sapsford, Simcoe Condominium Corporation No. 60, 2025 ONCAT 36

Maria Dimakas

In Private Practice17 cases2010–2026

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalJan 16, 2025

Condominium rule prohibiting utility trailers and limiting parking spaces was validly enacted and reasonable.

The applicant argued the rule was unreasonable and inconsistent with the declaration, which provided for 'first come, first served' parking.

The Tribunal concluded the rule was valid and consistent with the declaration, dismissing the application without costs.

1199831 Ontario Ltd v. Halton Standard Condominium Corporation No. 732, 2025 ONCAT 9

Tony Bui

In Private Practice25 cases2019–2026

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalDec 30, 2024

Tribunal application closed following confidential settlement agreement between the parties.

The applicant filed an application with the Condominium Authority Tribunal.

The parties subsequently reached a private and confidential settlement agreement that resolved the issues in dispute.

Krepel v. York Region Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1253, 2024 ONCAT 194

Patricia McQuaid

OCAT77 cases2007–2026

OCATCondominium Authority TribunalNov 19, 2024

Condominium nuisance application regarding cooking odours dismissed for lack of evidence.

The applicant provided little evidence to substantiate the claim, while the respondents provided evidence of HVAC inspections showing proper ventilation.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal found insufficient evidence to establish that the odours were unreasonable or constituted a nuisance.

The application was dismissed without costs.

Choi v. Lacerona, Tolentino, 2024 ONCAT 170

Page 1 of 34 (672 cases)

applicant_counsel

Katya UkrainetzCounsel
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance

assistance for the Licensee

Alice FengAgent
1 appearance

assisted the Licensee's Representative

Rob GilroyAgent
1 appearance

assisting the Licensee

Paul MillerAgent
1 appearance

Counsel

Joy MathewsCounsel
1 appearance
Justin McLartyCounsel
1 appearance
Megan MackeyCounsel
1 appearance
Natalia PolisCounsel
1 appearance
Emily DengCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Registrar

Richard KulisCounsel
1 appearance

for 1779145 Ontario Inc.

Jerry LevitanCounsel
1 appearance

for Aijia Li

Peter CopelandCounsel
1 appearance

for Clarke Chevrolet Buick GMC Ltd. and Andrew J. Clarke

Gregory G. GoulinCounsel
1 appearance

for Councillor Adam Giambrone

Chris GallopAgent
1 appearance

for herself

Julie BuckareffSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself and on behalf of the Objectors

Rosemary UllyotSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Misha GloubermanSelf-represented
2 appearances
John Bradley OrgarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randy KerrSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and the Resident Objectors

Sam SilverstoneSelf-represented
1 appearance

for James A. Clarke and Heather R. Clarke

Julian PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for Milagros Tolentino

Lewis LaceronaAgent
1 appearance

for Randy Kerr

William RobertsCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Rushlow

Andrew OstromCounsel
1 appearance

for Simcoe Condominium Corporation No. 60

Sonja HodisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Added Party

Eric DenOudenAgent
1 appearance
Charles WagmanCounsel
1 appearance
Rachel PilcCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica BraunCounsel
1 appearance
Scott NowoselskiCounsel
1 appearance
Jo-Anne BarnardAgent
1 appearance
Ron ProtockyAgent
1 appearance
Kevin ScullionCounsel
1 appearance
J. Daniel McConvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Justin JakubiakCounsel
3 appearances
Ed BlahaParalegal
2 appearances
Jerry LevitanCounsel
2 appearances
Troy KaterenchukAgent
1 appearance
John RoxonAgent
1 appearance
Naresh MandaviaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Harry PerlisCounsel
1 appearance
Murray SniderCounsel
1 appearance
10549Self-represented
1 appearance
Valeria SciclunaSelf-represented
1 appearance
N.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Vartan ManoukianParalegal
1 appearance
Jessica CanivetSelf-represented
1 appearance
Julie TremblaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Sontauna RapschParalegal
1 appearance
9626Self-represented
1 appearance
Saba AhmadCounsel
1 appearance
Gul TanisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajan MahavalirajanParalegal
1 appearance
Melanie BlaisSelf-represented
1 appearance

For the Appellant

AppellantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
Abdul MajeedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter EberhardCounsel
1 appearance
Noel GerryCounsel
1 appearance
Robert SindingCounsel
1 appearance
Justin JakubiakCounsel
1 appearance
Justin M. JakubiakCounsel
1 appearance
IOSelf-represented
1 appearance
One of the AppellantsSelf-represented
1 appearance
KLSelf-represented
1 appearance
E.C.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the applicant

Vu NguyenAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

David WinerAgent
4 appearances
Darlene MezzabottaParalegal
2 appearances
Kavita BoodramSelf-represented
2 appearances
Andrew FranzkeCounsel
2 appearances
Robert PlouffeAgent
2 appearances
Gareth StackhouseCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SievewrightSelf-represented
2 appearances
XianChen AnCounsel
2 appearances
Randall BarrsAgent
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Megan MackeyCounsel
2 appearances
Anna IordanidiAgent
1 appearance
Charles MontgomeryAgent
1 appearance
Anna WyszomierskaAgent
1 appearance
Douglas ForsytheAgent
1 appearance
Lauren EsquivelAgent
1 appearance
Lorie HawleyAgent
1 appearance
Seema AhmadAgent
1 appearance
Li YangSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shane KelfordAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant 2109889 Ontario Inc.

Carl CassellAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Mushtaq Khan

Mushtaq KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

Symon ZuckerCounsel
2 appearances
Michael SimaanCounsel
1 appearance
Yulia PesinCounsel
1 appearance
Robin SpinksCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah MolyneauxCounsel
1 appearance
Monica CaceresAgent
1 appearance
Mark ReynoldsAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Cambridge

John CosmanAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Ray KallioAgent
4 appearances
Ray KallioCounsel
4 appearances
Jessica BraunAgent
3 appearances
Kelly MatsumotoCounsel
2 appearances
Mark CrawfordCounsel
1 appearance
Debbie CamiloAgent
1 appearance
Mark CrawfordAgent
1 appearance
Jessica BrownAgent
1 appearance
Jessica BraunCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah O'ConnorAgent
1 appearance

for the Condominium

Sonia KociperAgent
1 appearance

for the corporate licensee

Peter KavidasSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kuldeep SinghSelf-represented
2 appearances
Adam VassosCounsel
2 appearances
Boris KravetsAgent
1 appearance
John G. WilsonAgent
1 appearance
Richard KnottAgent
1 appearance
James BarkeyAgent
1 appearance
Anthony BarileCounsel
1 appearance
Spiro BoulierisSelf-represented
1 appearance
John VitulliCounsel
1 appearance
Dale HillAgent
1 appearance
Fadi HakimAgent
1 appearance
Ron FritzCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce OlmsteadCounsel
1 appearance
Clyde SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Rino YagamiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BarileCounsel
1 appearance
Flavio BattistonCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffrey AyotteAgent
1 appearance
Randall BarrsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporate Licensee

Randall BarrsCounsel
2 appearances
Jerry LevitanAgent
1 appearance
Noel GerryCounsel
1 appearance
Louis RajnauthAgent
1 appearance
Christopher MorrisAgent
1 appearance
Jerry LevitanCounsel
1 appearance
John LineAgent
1 appearance
Ron FritzAgent
1 appearance
Cheryl NedrickAgent
1 appearance
Suvendiran PoopalasinghamAgent
1 appearance

for the Corporate Licensee and of Sritharan Mylvaganam and Eesan Subramaniam

Jerry LevitanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation

Wesley BuchnerAgent
1 appearance
Allen QiangAgent
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jessica BraunCounsel
2 appearances
Jo-Anne HainesAgent
1 appearance
Roger BobakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ray KallioCounsel
1 appearance
Nellie SnowballAgent
1 appearance
Joe MurphySelf-represented
1 appearance
Kevin KokCounsel
1 appearance

for the King-Spadina Resident's Association

Wayne ScottAgent
1 appearance

for the King-Spadina Residents Association

Wayne ScottAgent
2 appearances
Don RodbardAgent
1 appearance

for the licence holder

Jerry LevitanCounsel
2 appearances
John S. FregeauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Licence Holder

Emilio BiscegliaCounsel
2 appearances
David WinerCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher WuAgent
1 appearance

for the licensee

Noel GerryCounsel
1 appearance
Mr. MariniCounsel
1 appearance
Son NguyenAgent
1 appearance
Sucha Singh MokhaAgent
1 appearance
Kevin DavisCounsel
1 appearance
Quang DuongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Calvin BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Sucha Singh MokhaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom MalakosAgent
1 appearance

for the Licensee

Jerry LevitanAgent
18 appearances
Jerry LevitanCounsel
17 appearances
Randall BarrsCounsel
17 appearances
Adam VassosCounsel
10 appearances
Richard ElbirtAgent
5 appearances
Harvey DennisAgent
5 appearances
Jerry HerszkopfAgent
5 appearances
Greg BurdAgent
4 appearances
Michele KhitabAgent
4 appearances
Mike FigolAgent
4 appearances
Noel GerryCounsel
3 appearances
Adam VassosAgent
3 appearances
Patrick LittleAgent
3 appearances
Patrick AllenSelf-represented
3 appearances
Randall BarrsAgent
3 appearances
John ParkCounsel
2 appearances
Pradeep ChandCounsel
2 appearances
Norman GrootCounsel
2 appearances
Chris StevensAgent
2 appearances
Ashok KumarAgent
2 appearances

for the Licensee and the Transfer Applicant

Marc KoplowitzCounsel
1 appearance

for the licensees

Fouad HakeemSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Licensees

Kenji TsujinakaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Microsonic Group of Companies

Jerry LevitanAgent
1 appearance

for the Objector

Wayne ScottAgent
3 appearances
Donald RodbardAgent
1 appearance
David AstSelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela BurnsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey WagnerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter ShoebridgeAgent
1 appearance

for the Objectors

Ibie DemirdacheSelf-represented
1 appearance
Terrie-Lynne DevonishSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dennis MontpetitSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Registrant

John LeeCounsel
3 appearances
Barry WadsworthCounsel
2 appearances
Barry WadsworthAgent
2 appearances
Lisa Marie HickenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carol KirwanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Xiang Gui ZengSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jennifer HueAgent
1 appearance
Sevag YeghoyanAgent
1 appearance
Tharsan SribalanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael CarolineCounsel
1 appearance
Paul GolianCounsel
1 appearance

for the Registrar

Richard KulisCounsel
61 appearances
Richard KulisAgent
48 appearances
Phillip MorrisAgent
43 appearances
Phillip MorrisCounsel
40 appearances
Sujin ChanAgent
33 appearances
Joyce TaylorAgent
30 appearances
Bryna KaplanCounsel
26 appearances
Daniel AlakasAgent
17 appearances
Joyce TaylorCounsel
15 appearances
Sujin ChanCounsel
11 appearances
Brad AltonCounsel
11 appearances
Rena KhanAgent
10 appearances
Daniel AlakasCounsel
8 appearances
Rena KhanCounsel
7 appearances
Aviva HarariAgent
6 appearances
Dan AlakasAgent
5 appearances
Tamara BrooksAgent
5 appearances
Bryna KaplanAgent
4 appearances
Lorenzo PolicelliCounsel
3 appearances
Brad AltonAgent
3 appearances

for the Registrar, Alcohol and Gaming Commission

Phillip MorrisAgent
1 appearance
Dan AlakasAgent
1 appearance
Brad AltonAgent
1 appearance
Rena KhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Registrar of Motor Vehicles

Nora ChallisCounsel
1 appearance

for the resident objectors

Alvaro MallarinoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Resident Objectors

Graham JohnSelf-represented
1 appearance
Amanda JohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Rena KhanCounsel
10 appearances
Aviva HarariCounsel
5 appearances
Tamara BrooksCounsel
4 appearances
Kevin LockwoodAgent
4 appearances
Stella VelocciAgent
4 appearances
Michael RusekCounsel
4 appearances
Sonia De SantisAgent
4 appearances
Kate VarvaParalegal
4 appearances
Sanjay KapurAgent
3 appearances
Soussanna KarasCounsel
3 appearances
Victor YeeCounsel
2 appearances
Danielle PeckCounsel
2 appearances
Joyce TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Elizabeth MaishlishCounsel
2 appearances
Maya SabharwalCounsel
2 appearances
Brian M. YungCounsel
2 appearances
Patrick MooreCounsel
2 appearances
Zahir AliCounsel
2 appearances
Connie MalloryAgent
2 appearances
Gena ArgitisCounsel
1 appearance

For the Respondent

Steve GrootenboerAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Halton Standard Condominium Corporation No. 617

Jen DiasAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 872

Justin McLartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Poonam Dutta

Ian ShemeshParalegal
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Bree PierceCounsel
2 appearances
Barbara LakatosSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tae Ryung ChoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mi-Sug ParkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel GreanyaParalegal
1 appearance
Carol DirksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Silvia Yamine

Silvia YamineSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the transfer applicant

Can Zhong YaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2680

Natalia PolisCounsel
1 appearance

for TriCounty Addiction Services

Sara HammelAgent
1 appearance

for Xie Lie

Patrice BandCounsel
1 appearance

Objector/Party to the proceedings

Joe ArrudaSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of the licensee

Ravi CheemanlallAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Licensee

Cindy DouAgent
1 appearance

on her own behalf and on behalf of the objectors

Vula KawalezSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf and on behalf of the Corporate Licensee

JianPing ZhouSelf-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf and on behalf of the objectors

Ahmed BhaiyatSelf-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf and on behalf of the Objectors

Chris DeVitaSelf-represented
1 appearance

party to the proceeding

Stan KozakSelf-represented
1 appearance

principal of licensee

Barry AlperSelf-represented
1 appearance

Registrar's Representative

Richard KulisCounsel
1 appearance

respondent_counsel

Self-representedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ann PipeCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Houman MortazaviSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-Represented

David D. BucklandSelf-represented
1 appearance

The Applicant

Mohit BaliSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gianni de FrancescoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter ChoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sonia Mills-MinsterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ney CalderonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stella KowalchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Somkith ChaiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kamana SubediSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret Ann BogueSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steve MishibinijimaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SeifSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marc JulienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sarah FrenchSelf-represented
1 appearance

The Respondent

Margaret ReaAgent
1 appearance
Peter LessardAgent
1 appearance
Temesgen TirfeAgent
1 appearance
Rod EscayolaCounsel
1 appearance
Carolyn LaBatteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Luis HernandezCounsel
1 appearance
Clarence ClarkeAgent
1 appearance
John De VellisCounsel
1 appearance
Giancarlo MoscaAgent
1 appearance

The Respondents

Lewis LaceronaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christine SapsfordSelf-represented
1 appearance

672

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

2.9

cases/mo

AGCO429(64%)

OLAT160(24%)

OCAT74(11%)

OFSC6(1%)

OACRB3(0%)

Decision types

trial

295

motion

229

appeal

146

costs

Page 1 of 34 (672 cases)