Michael Kraljevic

The applicant appealed the City's failure to make a decision on a zoning by-law amendment application for a mixed-use development.

Following an interim decision, requests for review were filed.

The Chair of the Ontario Land Tribunal exercised his discretion to initiate a request for review and ordered a one-day motion for review to be heard electronically before a different Member.

The appellant filed a request for review of an August 11, 2023 Tribunal decision concerning official plan and zoning by-law amendments for a 15-building residential and mixed-use development in Toronto.

The Chair determined that the high threshold for review was met and exercised his discretion to vary the planning instruments to reference revised architectural plans.

The City of Burlington requested a review of a Tribunal decision that refused to dismiss an appeal of the new City Official Plan.

The original decision held that the appeal survived the sale of the subject property because it was 'tied to the land', and directed the City to contact the new owner.

The Tribunal Chair granted the request for review, finding that the original decision contained an error of law.

The Chair held that while Tribunal decisions regarding permitted land uses run with the land (in rem), the right to commence, maintain, or withdraw an appeal is a personal right (in personam).

The original decision was varied to dismiss the appeal without a hearing on the merits.

The appellant filed a request for review of a previous Ontario Land Tribunal decision that dismissed their appeal of City-initiated amendments to a zoning by-law.

The Chair determined that the request met the threshold under Rule 25.7 of the Tribunal's Rules of Practice and Procedure to warrant a review.

The Tribunal ordered that the previous decision be set aside and rescinded, and directed that the appeal be re-heard by a differently constituted panel.

The appellant filed a request for review of an Ontario Land Tribunal decision issued on August 15, 2025, relating to contested conditions of a draft plan of subdivision approval for lands in Ajax.

The Chair determined that the request met the threshold under Rule 25.7 of the Tribunal's Rules of Practice and Procedure to warrant a review.

The Tribunal ordered that the previous decision be set aside and rescinded, and directed that the appeal be re-heard by a differently constituted panel.

The applicant and the City of Toronto jointly requested that the Tribunal vary its previous Decision and Orders regarding a development at 4800 Yonge Street.

Relying on the sworn land use planning evidence of a Registered Professional Planner, the Tribunal Chair determined that the request met the threshold for review.

The Tribunal found that varying the Order to approve the amended official plan and zoning by-law was in the public interest and represented good planning.

The Tribunal ordered the amendments to the zoning by-law and official plan, and withheld the final order for site plan approval pending a registered Section 37 agreement.

The City of Ottawa filed a request for review of the Tribunal's decision regarding expropriation compensation claimed by the respondents.

The Chair of the Ontario Land Tribunal exercised his discretion to order a one-day motion for review to be heard electronically before a different Member of the Tribunal.

The Township of Springwater filed a request for review of an Ontario Land Tribunal decision issued on March 21, 2023, which approved consent applications for severance.

The Chair of the Tribunal determined that the request met the threshold to warrant a review.

The Tribunal ordered that the previous decision be set aside and rescinded, and that the appeal be re-heard by a differently constituted panel.

The appellant filed a request for review of an Ontario Land Tribunal decision regarding a minor variance appeal.

The Chair determined that the request met the threshold under Rule 25.7 of the Tribunal's Rules of Practice and Procedure to warrant a review.

The Tribunal ordered that the previous decision be set aside and the appeal be re-heard by a differently constituted panel.

The Township of Oro-Medonte filed a request for review of the Tribunal's decision issued on January 25, 2023, regarding appeals of Zoning By-law Amendment No. 2020-046.

The Chair determined that the request met the threshold to warrant a review.

The Tribunal ordered that the previous decision be set aside and rescinded, and that the appeals be re-heard by a differently constituted panel.