Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Saba Zia

Practising Law - Employed4 cases2014–2015

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 28, 2015

Reconsideration request dismissed as applicant merely sought to reargue the case and disagree with the decision.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that partially upheld his applications for contravention of settlement.

He argued the decision was biased, failed to acknowledge his Aboriginal Métis identity, improperly denied him the right to record the hearing, and denied him the opportunity to cross-examine the respondent.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the applicant was merely rearguing his case and disagreeing with the decision, and that none of his arguments met the criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5.

Reyes v. Centric Health Corporation, 2015 HRTO 698

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 28, 2015

Leave to file new application denied for declared vexatious litigant raising previously dismissed allegations.

The applicant, previously declared a vexatious litigant with respect to the respondents, sought leave to file a new human rights application alleging discrimination based on family and marital status, as well as reprisal.

The Tribunal found that the new application raised essentially the same allegations as three previous applications that had been dismissed.

Concluding that the applicant failed to demonstrate the new application was a legitimate assertion of rights and not an abuse of process, the Tribunal denied leave to file the application.

Weihua Shi v. Holcim (Canada) Inc. and Anna Maccani, 2015 HRTO 705

Daniel McDonald

35 cases2009–2024

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 14, 2015

Human rights application dismissed for abandonment after the applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal.

The Tribunal deferred the application pending the conclusion of another proceeding between the parties.

After the other proceeding concluded, the respondent requested the application be reactivated.

The applicant's counsel subsequently withdrew, and the applicant failed to respond to a Tribunal direction requiring her to indicate whether she intended to proceed.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it, noting the importance of dealing with applications fairly, justly, and expeditiously.

Kerrilyn Huntley v. Hydro One Networks Inc., 2015 HRTO 636

Peter Thorup

22 cases1985–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 11, 2015

Human rights application dismissed; employer reasonably investigated and resolved the workplace harassment complaint.

The applicant, a union organizer of Italian/Sicilian descent, filed a human rights application alleging that his employer failed to properly investigate his internal complaint regarding a co-worker's harassing comments about his nationality.

The Tribunal applied the three-part Laskowska test to assess the reasonableness of the employer's investigation.

The Tribunal found that the employer had a suitable anti-harassment policy, promptly and reasonably investigated the complaint through an independent third-party investigator, and provided a reasonable resolution by issuing verbal warnings to both employees involved.

The application was dismissed.

Giovanni Zambito v. LIUNA Local 183 and Central Eastern Canadian Organizing Fund, 2015 HRTO 605

Human rights application dismissed as employer's cross-border trucking operations fall under federal jurisdiction.

The applicant, a truck driver, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal against his former employer, a recycling company.

The respondents brought a preliminary motion arguing the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because the employer's operations involved continuous and regular transportation of materials to the United States.

The Tribunal agreed, finding that the undertaking fell under federal jurisdiction pursuant to s. 92(10)(a) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Tingen v. 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management, 2015 HRTO 591

Andrew Lister

8 cases2000–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 24, 2015

Application against union dismissed at summary hearing for failing to link inaction to disability.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability by his employer and his union.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine whether the application against the union had a reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged the union failed to act on his complaints regarding the employer's failure to accommodate his disability.

The Tribunal dismissed the application against the union, finding the applicant provided no evidence linking the union's inaction to his disability.

Jean Binette v. Unifor (formerly Canadian Auto Workers) Local 4270 and R.A. Centre, 2015 HRTO 529

Daniel McDonald

35 cases2009–2024

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 23, 2015

Request to reactivate deferred application granted; applicant directed to confirm intention to proceed.

The respondent filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to reactivate a deferred application following the conclusion of another proceeding between the same parties.

The applicant did not file a response, and her counsel informed the Tribunal that she was no longer retained.

The Tribunal granted the request to reactivate the application as the respondent complied with the Rules of Procedure and the applicant did not oppose.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to confirm her intention to proceed within seven days, failing which the application would likely be deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Huntley v. Hydro One Networks Inc., 2015 HRTO 516

Patricia Murray

26 cases1997–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 21, 2015

Human rights application dismissed summarily as applicant failed to show reasonable prospect of proving discrimination.

The applicant, a Black male casual Educational Assistant, was terminated after surreptitiously obtaining a 16-year-old female student's phone number and sending her numerous text messages late at night.

He filed a human rights application alleging his termination was based on his race and sex, and was a reprisal for previous accommodation requests.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and dismissed the application, finding no reasonable prospect that the applicant could prove his allegations on a balance of probabilities, as his claims relied on bald assertions and speculation rather than probative evidence.

Oluwagbenga Adegorite v. York Region District School Board, 2015 HRTO 498

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 2, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment.

Neither party attended the scheduled hearing or contacted the Tribunal to explain their absence.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Jordan Sanderson v. Joseph Mitschang, 2015 HRTO 440

Christopher McClelland

26 cases2009–2025

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 25, 2015

Human rights application dismissed after the applicant failed to attend the hearing on the merits.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code but failed to attend the scheduled hearing on the merits.

The respondent and its counsel attended the hearing.

Noting the Tribunal's duty to dispose of applications fairly, justly, and expeditiously, and the resources expended by the respondent and the Tribunal, the adjudicator dismissed the application due to the applicant's non-attendance.

Muhammad Qamar v. G4S Secure Solutions (Canada) Ltd., 2015 HRTO 386

Mona Staples

Not Practising Law - Employed11 cases2013–2016

Mark Mason

3 cases2012–2015

Civita Gauley

4 cases2014–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 24, 2015

Human rights application dismissed; labour arbitration appropriately dealt with substance and claims against union lacked prospect of success.

The applicant, who had a drug addiction, was terminated from his employment with the corporate respondent for violating a Last Chance Agreement.

His union grieved the termination, but a labour arbitrator upheld the discharge and found no violation of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant then filed an application with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario alleging discrimination by both the employer and the union.

The Tribunal dismissed the application against the employer under s. 45.1 of the Code, finding that the labour arbitration had appropriately dealt with the substance of the human rights allegations.

The Tribunal also dismissed the application against the union, finding it had no reasonable prospect of success because the union's alleged failure to properly represent the applicant was not linked to a Code ground.

Federow v. Niagara Falls (City), 2015 HRTO 377

Howard Goldblatt

In Private Practice99 cases1984–2025

Darragh Meagher

38 cases2003–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 23, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as an impermissible collateral attack on an interest arbitration award.

The applicant, a firefighter, filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination regarding his eligibility for post-retirement benefits under a collective agreement.

The terms of the collective agreement had been determined by a Board of Arbitration following an interest arbitration.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that the Board of Arbitration had jurisdiction to apply the Code, appropriately dealt with the substance of the dispute, and that the application constituted an impermissible collateral attack on the arbitration award.

Douglas Brooks v. City of Toronto, 2015 HRTO 362

Lisa Triano

16 cases2000–2025

Daniel McDonald

35 cases2009–2024

Carolyn Hart

In Private Practice21 cases1993–2015

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 18, 2015

Human rights application alleging failure to promote based on sex and reprisal dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant, a female electrician, alleged that she was denied a promotion to a supervisory position because of her sex and as a reprisal for previously complaining about gender-based harassment.

During the merits hearing, after the applicant presented her evidence, the respondent moved to dismiss the application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the successful male candidates had superior paper qualifications and that there was no evidence linking the hiring committee's decision to the applicant's sex or her prior harassment complaints.

The application was dismissed.

Huntley v. Hydro One Networks Inc., 2015 HRTO 347

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 9, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with pre-hearing disclosure directions.

The applicant failed to comply with the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure regarding pre-hearing disclosure of documents and witnesses.

After her counsel withdrew, the Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to file the required materials or confirm she would rely only on her pleadings, warning that failure to do so would likely result in dismissal.

The applicant did not respond to the direction.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it, cancelling the scheduled hearing.

Bronson v. Kingston and Frontenac Housing Corporation, 2015 HRTO 281

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 25, 2015

Adjournment request denied; vague 'personal reasons' do not constitute extraordinary circumstances.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled summary hearing for unspecified 'personal reasons' more than 14 days after the Notice of Summary Hearing was issued.

The respondents opposed the request.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment, finding that the vague statement of personal reasons did not constitute an extraordinary circumstance justifying an adjournment under the Tribunal's Practice Direction.

Tuleep Fernando v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, 2015 HRTO 231

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 10, 2015

Human rights application dismissed after applicant informed Tribunal she would not attend the hearing.

The applicant informed the Tribunal that she would not be attending the scheduled hearing.

As it is the applicant's responsibility to attend and provide evidence in support of her allegations, the Tribunal dismissed the application for failure to attend.

Izabella Sokolowska v. Nexonia Inc., 2015 HRTO 187

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 4, 2015

Adjournment request denied; vague business travel is not an extraordinary circumstance justifying late rescheduling.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the hearing three days before it was scheduled to commence, citing potential business travel.

The Tribunal noted that the request was made well past the 14-day period allowed under its Practice Direction and that the applicant had also failed to comply with disclosure rules.

Finding that vague business travel did not constitute an extraordinary circumstance, the Tribunal denied the adjournment request and directed the applicant to confirm her attendance or face dismissal of the application.

Sokolowska v. Nexonia Inc., 2015 HRTO 164

Edward J. Posliff

14 cases2005–2020

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 30, 2015

Human rights application dismissed after applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code but failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was aware of the hearing date and location but chose not to attend.

Noting the significant resources expended by the respondent and the Tribunal, and the Tribunal's duty to dispose of applications fairly, justly, and expeditiously, the Tribunal dismissed the application.

Patricia White v. Amherstburg Police Service, 2015 HRTO 147

Dan J. Shields

18 cases2003–2022

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 23, 2015

Human rights application dismissed under section 45.1 as the substance was appropriately dealt with at arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal regarding the termination of his employment.

Prior to this, his union had filed a grievance on his behalf, which proceeded to arbitration.

The arbitrator found the employer lacked just cause for dismissal and awarded severance and wages, but declined reinstatement.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that the arbitrator had concurrent jurisdiction to decide human rights issues and that the legal issue decided was essentially the same as the one before the Tribunal.

Concluding that the applicant was attempting to relitigate the same dispute, the Tribunal dismissed the application.

Edwards v. Carillion Services Inc., 2015 HRTO 99

Stephanie M. Ramsay

2 cases2015–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 15, 2015

Summary hearing dismisses age and disability claims but allows sex discrimination and reprisal claims to proceed.

The applicant, a male personal support worker, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on sex, gender identity, age, and disability, as well as reprisal.

The respondent requested a summary hearing to dismiss the application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's allegations regarding the respondent's practice of assigning male workers only to male patients, and his allegation that his termination was a reprisal for filing the application, had a reasonable prospect of success and would proceed to a merits hearing.

The remaining allegations regarding age discrimination, disability discrimination based on work-related stress, and reprisal for non-Code complaints were dismissed.

Galuego v. Spectrum Health Care, 2015 HRTO 62

Page 9 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom RabaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steven GerredSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Sean FlahertyCounsel
2 appearances
Corey ChandlerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
2 appearances
Ernst GoetzeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Najeem EbrahimiAgent
2 appearances
Richard ClarkeSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Matthew OrchardCounsel
1 appearance
C. April StewartAgent
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Shaheynoor TalukderCounsel
1 appearance
Lorraine PorCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance
Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
1 appearance
David TurnerCounsel
1 appearance
Richard WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Pranavan GaneshalingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brennagh SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 9 of 29 (567 cases)

Saba Zia

Ken Bhattacharjee

Reyes v. Centric Health Corporation, 2015 HRTO 698

Ken Bhattacharjee

Weihua Shi v. Holcim (Canada) Inc. and Anna Maccani, 2015 HRTO 705

Daniel McDonald

Ken Bhattacharjee

Kerrilyn Huntley v. Hydro One Networks Inc., 2015 HRTO 636

Peter Thorup

Ken Bhattacharjee

Giovanni Zambito v. LIUNA Local 183 and Central Eastern Canadian Organizing Fund, 2015 HRTO 605

Suzanne Porter

Crista Rea

Ken Bhattacharjee

Tingen v. 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management, 2015 HRTO 591

Andrew Lister

Ken Bhattacharjee

Jean Binette v. Unifor (formerly Canadian Auto Workers) Local 4270 and R.A. Centre, 2015 HRTO 529

Daniel McDonald

Ken Bhattacharjee

Huntley v. Hydro One Networks Inc., 2015 HRTO 516

Patricia Murray

Ken Bhattacharjee

Oluwagbenga Adegorite v. York Region District School Board, 2015 HRTO 498

Ken Bhattacharjee

Jordan Sanderson v. Joseph Mitschang, 2015 HRTO 440

Christopher McClelland

Ken Bhattacharjee

Muhammad Qamar v. G4S Secure Solutions (Canada) Ltd., 2015 HRTO 386

Mona Staples

Mark Mason

Civita Gauley

Ken Bhattacharjee

Federow v. Niagara Falls (City), 2015 HRTO 377

Howard Goldblatt

Darragh Meagher

Ken Bhattacharjee

Douglas Brooks v. City of Toronto, 2015 HRTO 362

Lisa Triano

Daniel McDonald

Carolyn Hart

Ken Bhattacharjee

Huntley v. Hydro One Networks Inc., 2015 HRTO 347

Ken Bhattacharjee

Bronson v. Kingston and Frontenac Housing Corporation, 2015 HRTO 281

Ken Bhattacharjee

Tuleep Fernando v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, 2015 HRTO 231

Ken Bhattacharjee

Izabella Sokolowska v. Nexonia Inc., 2015 HRTO 187

Ken Bhattacharjee

Sokolowska v. Nexonia Inc., 2015 HRTO 164

Edward J. Posliff

Ken Bhattacharjee

Patricia White v. Amherstburg Police Service, 2015 HRTO 147

Dan J. Shields

Ken Bhattacharjee

Edwards v. Carillion Services Inc., 2015 HRTO 99

Stephanie M. Ramsay

Ken Bhattacharjee

Galuego v. Spectrum Health Care, 2015 HRTO 62

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Applicant

Counsel for Respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Baywood Homes

for Beck Taxi Limited

for both Applicants

for Bruce Johnston

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

for himself

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited