J. Wilson is a board member at the Ontario Labour Relations Board with 146 decisions on record from 1981 to 1987. Key areas include employment and labour law, administrative law, construction law.

What tribunal does J. Wilson sit on?

J. Wilson sits on the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

What areas of law does J. Wilson decide?

J. Wilson's most common areas include Employment and Labour Law (146 decisions), Administrative Law (39 decisions), Construction Law (14 decisions). J. Wilson has handled 146 decisions across 5 areas.

How many decisions has J. Wilson made?

J. Wilson has 146 decisions on record from 1981 to 1987.

Who frequently appears before J. Wilson?

Representatives who frequently appear before J. Wilson include B. Fishbein, Douglas J. Wray, David McKee.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

J. Wilson — Board Member

Employment and Labour Law

J. Wilson

Board Member·Ontario Labour Relations Board·Since 1981

146

cases · 7 yrs · OLRB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Board Member· 140Board Member· 3Board Member· 2Board Member· 1

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 9, 1982

Minister has authority to appoint arbitration nominee as collective agreement covers non-construction work.

The Minister of Labour referred a question to the Ontario Labour Relations Board regarding his authority to appoint a nominee to an arbitration board on behalf of the employer.

The employer objected to the appointment, arguing that the collective agreement only applied to the industrial, commercial and institutional (ICI) sector of the construction industry, whereas the grievances related to non-construction work.

The Board found that through its membership in the Ontario Painting Contractors Association, the employer had authorized the association to bargain on its behalf for both construction and non-construction work.

Consequently, the provincial agreement bound the employer for non-construction work as well.

The Board advised the Minister that he had the authority to appoint a nominee.

London Sandblasting & Painting Limited v. International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades, 1982 CanLII 1038

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 3, 1982

Union certified for construction labourers despite employer's limited Ontario presence and Quebec decree.

The applicant trade union applied for certification of a bargaining unit of construction labourers employed by the respondent.

The respondent, a Quebec-based company, argued that its limited presence in Ontario and the application of the Quebec Construction decree made certification inappropriate.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board held that the respondent's limited presence and the Quebec decree did not preclude certification under Ontario law.

Finding that the applicant had the requisite membership support, the Board granted the application and issued certificates for the industrial, commercial, and institutional sector and all other sectors in the appropriate geographic area.

Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 1036 v. Common Construction Company Ltd., 1982 CanLII 1034

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 19, 1982

Hotel switchboard operators excluded from bargaining unit; employee terminated on application date included in count.

The applicant trade union applied for certification for full-time and part-time bargaining units at the respondent's hotel.

The parties agreed to exclude office and front desk staff but disputed the inclusion of switchboard operators.

The Board found that switchboard operators shared a closer community of interest with front desk and office staff and excluded them from the units.

The Board also resolved disputes over the employee status of several individuals, finding that an acting chef had ceased managerial duties before the application date, and that an employee terminated on the morning of the application date was still considered an employee for the purpose of the application.

The Board determined the membership percentages and directed the matter to be re-listed to hear outstanding issues regarding alleged discriminatory discharges.

Food and Service Workers of Canada v. Bond Place Hotel, 1982 CanLII 947

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 17, 1982

Board confirms assignment of drywall taping work to Bricklayers based on established area practice in Kingston.

The Bricklayers filed a jurisdictional dispute complaint regarding the assignment of drywall taping work at a shopping mall construction project in Kingston.

The employer, Brunswick Drywall, had a collective agreement with the Painters but assigned the work to the Bricklayers at the general contractor's instruction.

The Board considered area practice, noting that the Bricklayers had performed drywall taping almost exclusively in the Kingston area for many years.

The Board confirmed the assignment of the work to the Bricklayers for this specific project.

The International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen and its Local 10 v. The International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades, 1982 CanLII 949

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 5, 1982

Leave to withdraw jurisdictional dispute application granted; Board declines to dismiss to encourage pre-hearing settlements.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its jurisdictional dispute application under section 91 of the Labour Relations Act following the completion of the pre-hearing conference process.

The respondent argued the application should be dismissed rather than withdrawn.

The Board held that settlements and withdrawals after pre-hearing discovery should be encouraged without prejudice, as dismissing such applications could discourage unions from utilizing the Board's processes and lead to disruptive self-help measures.

The Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Labourers' International Union of North America, Ontario Provincial District Council v. Anchor Shoring Limited, 1982 CanLII 946

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 4, 1982

Reconsideration of certification denied where employer failed to file a timely reply despite notice.

The employer requested that the Ontario Labour Relations Board reconsider its decision granting two certificates to the union, seeking to reopen the matter to file a reply and give evidence.

The employer had failed to file a reply or request a hearing prior to the original decision, despite receiving notice and multiple follow-ups from Board staff.

The Board dismissed the request for reconsideration, finding that the employer failed to act with due diligence and must accept the consequences of ignoring the express requirements to respond in a timely fashion.

Labourers International Union of North America, Local 183 v. Karvon Construction Limited, 1982 CanLII 955

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 4, 1982

Certification application dismissed as the only other employee was hired contrary to the collective agreement.

The applicant union applied for certification and a pre-hearing representation vote was held.

The intervener challenged the eligibility of one of the two voters, alleging he was hired contrary to the hiring hall provisions of the applicable provincial collective agreement.

The Board found that the intervener had not waived its right to a hearing on the challenge despite failing to file written representations.

On the merits, the Board held that the challenged voter was employed in violation of the collective agreement and therefore was not an employee in the bargaining unit for the purposes of the application.

As this left only one employee in the unit, the Board found there was no appropriate bargaining unit and dismissed the application.

Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 837 v. Cooper Construction Company Limited, 1982 CanLII 951

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 30, 1982

Board has jurisdiction over work assignment dispute where collective agreements lack mutual dispute-settlement mechanism.

The complainants requested a direction under section 91 of the Act regarding a work assignment dispute on a pipeline project.

The respondent unions raised a preliminary objection, arguing the Board lacked jurisdiction under section 91(14) because the collective agreements required referring such disputes to a mutually selected tribunal.

The Board found that while one collective agreement contained a specific jurisdictional dispute mechanism, the other did not.

Therefore, the collective agreements did not establish a mutual dispute-settlement mechanism that would exclude the Board's jurisdiction.

The preliminary objection was dismissed and the matter was listed for a hearing on the merits.

Labourers' International Union of North America Ontario Provincial District Council v. O.J. Pipelines Ltd., 1982 CanLII 929

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 20, 1982

Board finds equipment replacement is construction work; separate arrangement during ICI strike violates Labour Relations Act.

The applicants sought relief under sections 135 and 89 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging that the respondents entered into an unlawful arrangement during a lawful strike in the industrial, commercial and institutional (ICI) sector of the construction industry.

Members of the respondent union employed by Kamtar went on strike but later returned to perform the same work for Quinard under a 'maintenance agreement'.

The Board found that the work, which involved replacing large pieces of equipment and installing new piping, constituted construction work in the ICI sector, not maintenance work.

Consequently, the arrangement between Quinard and the union violated section 146(2) of the Act.

The Board directed the respondents to cease applying the maintenance agreement and to cease supplying and employing union members on the project.

Mechanical Contractors Association Ontario v. United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 628, 1982 CanLII 931

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 15, 1982

Board establishes formula for calculating monetary losses arising from bad faith bargaining during a strike.

The Board determined the appropriate measure and period of entitlement for monetary losses arising from the respondent's bad faith bargaining.

The Board held that the period of entitlement ran from April 1, 1980, to December 3, 1980.

For the period between April 1 and June 17, 1980, damages were limited to the net monetary claim, reflecting the difference between what employees would have received had they continued to work and the 9% increase that would have resulted from good faith bargaining.

From June 18 to December 3, 1980, striking employees were entitled to their gross monetary claim.

The Board also ruled that grievors were obligated to mitigate their losses after February 13, 1981.

United Steelworkers of America v. Fotomat Canada Limited, 1982 CanLII 924

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 23, 1982

Board declines to remove International union from employee bargaining agency designations despite past non-participation.

The Minister of Labour referred a question to the Ontario Labour Relations Board regarding whether the International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers should be removed from certain designated employee bargaining agencies in the industrial, commercial and institutional sector.

The local unions argued that the International Association had not historically participated in bargaining and had expressly disclaimed liability under the provincial agreements.

The Board held that the International Association should remain part of the designations, as its involvement could provide a beneficial overview and maturity to the provincial bargaining process, fulfilling the intent of the legislation.

International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental iron Workers, Local Unions 721, 736, 759, 765 and 786 v. International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, 1982 CanLII 879

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 14, 1982

Union locals breached the Labour Relations Act by supplying workers to contractors during a province-wide strike.

The applicant employer bargaining agency alleged that during a province-wide strike in the industrial, commercial and institutional (ICI) sector of the construction industry, the respondent affiliated bargaining agents continued to supply union members to certain contractors.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the supply of men during a province-wide strike constituted an unlawful arrangement contrary to section 146(2) of the Labour Relations Act.

The Board also held that trade unions have an ongoing obligation under section 148(1) to take reasonable steps to ensure that a strike is called and authorized uniformly, and that the respondents breached this duty by permitting members to work.

Cease and desist orders were issued.

Mechanical Contractors Association Ontario v. United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 46, 1982 CanLII 885

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 9, 1982

Site-wide picketing during a lawful strike that causes unconnected trades to strike unlawfully is prohibited.

The applicants sought a declaration and cease-and-desist order against the respondent union for engaging in site-wide picketing during a lawful province-wide strike in the ICI sector.

The picketing caused employees of other trades, who were not in a legal strike position, to refuse to cross the picket lines, effectively halting all construction activity in the Sarnia area.

The Board found that while the respondent was engaged in a lawful strike, picketing directed at employees of employers unconnected to the dispute (other than by geography) constituted secondary picketing that caused an unlawful strike.

The Board ordered the respondent to cease picketing at common sites unless reserved gates were established or struck work was being performed.

Sarnia Construction Association v. United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local Union 663, 1982 CanLII 883

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 28, 1982

Motion to strike complaint of unlawful picketing and strikes dismissed despite cessation of conduct.

The complainants sought a cease and desist order and damages, alleging the respondents engaged in unlawful picketing and strikes to prevent the employer from operating with members of the Christian Labour Association of Canada.

The respondents moved to strike the claims, arguing the alleged unlawful conduct had ceased months prior.

The Board dismissed the motion, finding no overriding labour-relations purpose to decline hearing the application or limiting the potential remedies before hearing the evidence.

Tecumseth Insulation Services Ltd. v. Toronto Building and Construction Trades Council, 1982 CanLII 915

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 3, 1982

Board grants certification and includes 'professional' in bargaining unit description to avoid fragmentation.

The applicant applied for certification as the bargaining agent for certain employees of the respondent.

The Board first determined that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act.

The parties agreed on most of the bargaining unit description but disputed whether the word "professional" should be included.

The applicant argued that "professional" should be added to cover future non-managerial professionals, such as psychometrists, who might not fall under "Child Care" or "Social Work" staff.

The respondent contended that "professional" was unnecessary and could lead to litigation.

The Board noted its previous decisions in the child welfare field, where "professional" staff were sometimes excluded from "all employee" units, implying that the term has meaning in this context.

To avoid potential fragmentation or exclusion of professional employees from union representation, the Board granted the applicant's request to include "professional" in the bargaining unit description.

A certificate was issued to the applicant.

The Professional Staff Association of the Children's Aid Society of Hamilton-Wentworth v. The Children's Aid Society of Hamilton-Wentworth, 1982 CanLII 916

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardApr 16, 1982

Request for reconsideration denied; no conflict found between craft and labourer bargaining unit descriptions.

The applicant, Harold R. Stark Company Limited, requested that the Ontario Labour Relations Board reconsider its decision dismissing a jurisdictional dispute complaint under section 91(1) of the Labour Relations Act.

The applicant argued that the matter should be treated under section 91(18) due to an alleged conflict between the bargaining unit descriptions in the U.A. and Labourers' provincial agreements.

The Board found no conflict in the recognition clauses, noting that the U.A. agreement covered a craft unit while the Labourers' agreement covered construction labourers.

The Board concluded that any conflict arose from competing work jurisdictions rather than bargaining unit descriptions, and denied the request for reconsideration.

A dissenting board member would have treated the matter as a jurisdictional dispute.

Harold R. Stark Company Limited v. United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 463, 1982 CanLII 819

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardApr 1, 1982

Certification under section 8 denied as employer's unfair labour practices did not prevent ascertaining employees' true wishes.

The applicant union applied for certification and requested the Board apply section 8 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the employer committed unfair labour practices that prevented the ascertainment of the employees' true wishes.

The Board found that the employer violated the Act when a manager attempted to elicit information from an employee about the union and suggested forming an employee association.

However, the Board concluded that this violation, along with a previously remedied unlawful termination, did not make it unlikely that the true wishes of the employees could be ascertained.

The application for certification under section 8 was dismissed, but the Board ordered the employer to cease and desist from unlawful interference and to post and distribute a notice to employees.

Canadian Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink and Distillery Workers v. Charterways Transportation Limited, 1982 CanLII 813

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMar 30, 1982

Union certified for development-stage mining employees; build-up principle inapplicable without fixed expansion plans.

The union applied for certification of employees at an abandoned gold mine currently undergoing dewatering and rebuilding.

The employer argued the application was premature due to a potential future build-up of employees.

The Board rejected this argument as the employer had no fixed plans for expansion.

Applying established Board policy for mining operations, the Board determined that the mine was in the 'development stage' and defined the appropriate bargaining unit accordingly.

Finding that more than 55% of the employees in the unit were union members, the Board granted the certificate.

United Steelworkers of America v. Diepdaume Mines Limited, 1982 CanLII 852

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardFeb 17, 1982

Preliminary motions to dismiss complaint, defer to internal union procedures, and order particulars dismissed.

The respondents brought preliminary motions to dismiss an unfair labour practice complaint without a hearing, to defer the matter to internal union procedures, and to require further particulars.

The complaint alleged that the respondents placed the local unions under trusteeship to penalize them for filing a previous complaint.

The Board dismissed the motion to dismiss without a hearing, finding that the complex factual and legal issues required a full hearing.

The Board also declined to defer to the union's internal procedures, noting that the complaint raised fundamental rights under the Labour Relations Act that transcend internal union matters.

Finally, the Board found the particulars provided by the complainants to be sufficient and directed the matter to be listed for a hearing on the merits.

The International Association of Bridge, Structural, and Ornamental, Ironworkers Locals 721 et al. v. The International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers et al., 1982 CanLII 842

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJan 19, 1982

Board dismisses union's request to reconsider certification decision; no denial of natural justice found.

The Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 506 requested that the Ontario Labour Relations Board reconsider its decisions certifying the Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association, Local 172 and dismissing Local 506's subsequent application for certification.

Local 506 argued that the Board committed a jurisdictional error and denied natural justice by refusing to treat its application as having been made on the same date as Local 172's application, which would have resulted in a representation vote.

The Board dismissed the request for reconsideration, finding that it had properly exercised its discretion under the Labour Relations Act and its Rules of Procedure, and that no employees had been denied the right to be heard.

Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association, Local 172 v. Clifford Masonry Limited, 1982 CanLII 1070

Page 6 of 8 (146 cases)

for 449637 Ontario Inc.

G. A. HowardCounsel
1 appearance

for Beckett Elevator Company Limited

A. HopkirkAgent
1 appearance
W J. McNaughtonCounsel
1 appearance

for Cencan Concrete & Tile Limited

David GreerAgent
1 appearance
Franco BortuzzoAgent
1 appearance

for Christian Labour Association of Canada

Edw. VanderkloetCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth ForsterCounsel
1 appearance
Kerry LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Win. R. HerridgeCounsel
1 appearance

for Code I Investments Inc., employer

Michael T. FranckCounsel
1 appearance

for Daynes Health Care Limited and Earl Daynes

Paul R. TrethewayCounsel
1 appearance

for Dranco Group Inc., Donald Construction Limited and C.D.C. Contracting, employers

Robert D. StattonCounsel
1 appearance

for Dufferin Construction Company, a Division of St. Lawrence Cement and Bot Construction (Canada) Limited, employers

5. C. BernardoCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellis Don Limited and Aztec Contracting Inc., employers

Richard A. MonetteCounsel
1 appearance

for Fapp-Co Contractors Ltd., employer

Michael G. HoranCounsel
1 appearance
Tony MichaelCounsel
1 appearance

for Fred Iacovoni

Pauline DietrichCounsel
1 appearance

for Fred Iacovoni and the Ministry of Labour

H. P. RolphCounsel
1 appearance

for High Rise Crane and Rentals Limited, employer

Richard NixonCounsel
1 appearance

for Hotel Employees Restaurant Employees Union, Local 75

Alick RyderCounsel
1 appearance

for International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers Local 700

J. HarrowerCounsel
1 appearance

for International Association of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers, Local 721

Stan ArsenaultCounsel
1 appearance
S. UrselCounsel
1 appearance

for intervener #1

S. B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance
P. HarrisUnion representative
1 appearance
P. LittleUnion representative
1 appearance

for intervener #2

S. C. BernardoCounsel
2 appearances
Jim RisCounsel
1 appearance
Jim RossCounsel
1 appearance
Jack PesheauUnion representative
1 appearance
Michael A. ChurchCounsel
1 appearance
Richard J. CharneyCounsel
1 appearance
Kauko NiemiUnion representative
1 appearance

for intervener #3

Bruce BinningCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel FryzukCounsel
2 appearances
R. A. WerryCounsel
1 appearance
Wes LippettCounsel
1 appearance
W LippettCounsel
1 appearance

for intervener #4

Hercules E. FagaCounsel
2 appearances

for interveners #1 and # 2

G. GrossmanCounsel
1 appearance
R. A. WerryCounsel
1 appearance

for interveners #1 and #2

G. GrossmanCounsel
1 appearance
R. A. WerryCounsel
1 appearance

for Janin Building and Civil Works Ltd.

Christian HucCounsel
1 appearance
James B. NoonanCounsel
1 appearance
Richard NixonCounsel
1 appearance

for J.D.S. Investments Limited

David SmuschkowitzAgent
1 appearance
James BallardCounsel
1 appearance
Robin B. CumineCounsel
1 appearance

for Kamtar Construction Limited

D. MagneAgent
1 appearance
R. J. Mc CombCounsel
1 appearance

for Kennedy Lodge Inc.

David DuncanAgent
1 appearance
Earl DaynesAgent
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance

for Kennedy Lodge Limited Partnership

John G. Parkinson, Q. C.Counsel
1 appearance
Jonathan H. WigleyCounsel
1 appearance

for Labourers International Union of North America and its Local Union 1081

B. FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance
K. RimmingtonUnion representative
1 appearance
T ConnollyUnion representative
1 appearance

for Labourers International Union of North America, Local 183 and The Form Work Council of Ontario

L. DetoniCounsel
1 appearance
R. LotitoCounsel
1 appearance
S. B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance

for Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 506

Mr. GrantCounsel
1 appearance

for Lisgar Construction Company and Aztec Contracting Inc., employers

William S. ChallisCounsel
1 appearance

for Lou Leclaire Contracting Ltd.

L. LeclaireAgent
1 appearance
M. HoranCounsel
1 appearance

for Manacon Construction Limited, DAngelo Plastering Company Limited and Leader Structures (Ontario) 1980 Limited

Pierre JauvinCounsel
1 appearance

for Martin Ross Construction Ltd.

Joseph FishmanAgent
1 appearance
Martin AddarioCounsel
1 appearance

for McLean-Peister Ltd.

James B. NoonanCounsel
1 appearance
Glen PeisterAgent
1 appearance
Barry RyanAgent
1 appearance

for Medox Health Care Services and Drake International Inc.

Paul MichaelsCounsel
1 appearance
B. H. BresnerCounsel
1 appearance
Robert ButlerAgent
1 appearance

for Metropolitan Toronto Apartment Builders Association

K. MalletteCounsel
1 appearance

for Metropolitan Toronto Sewer and Watermain Contractors Association

Sandy CochranAgent
1 appearance
Allan JonesAgent
1 appearance

for O.J. Pipelines Ltd.

P.M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
N. WaldbillgCounsel
1 appearance

for Projecta Engineering and Construction Inc.

Michael DemkoAgent
1 appearance

for Quinard Limited

R. J. Mc CombCounsel
1 appearance
R. MorissetteAgent
1 appearance

for respondents Michel Rivard Plumbing Limited and J. G. Rivard Limited

N. S. SloverCounsel
1 appearance

for Sheafer-Townsend Construction Limited

D. L. BrisbinCounsel
1 appearance
R. G. Mc DadeAgent
1 appearance

for Simcoe Mechanical Contracting Limited

Gary GrahamCounsel
2 appearances
Janice RoseCounsel
1 appearance

for S. R. Lentz Construction Incorporated

Stephen R. LentzAgent
1 appearance

for Steinberg Inc.

R. BuddCounsel
1 appearance

for Sword Contracting Ltd.

A. GagneCounsel
1 appearance

for Sword Contracting Ltd. and Metropolitan Toronto Apartment Builders Association

R. C. Filion, Q.C.Counsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

B. FishbeinCounsel
5 appearances
Douglas J. WrayCounsel
4 appearances
David McKeeCounsel
4 appearances
M. CornishCounsel
3 appearances
David StrangUnion representative
2 appearances
James CaronUnion representative
2 appearances
Bruce ZufeltAgent
2 appearances
Carlos InfusinoUnion representative
2 appearances
C. M. MitchellCounsel
2 appearances
Brian ShellCounsel
2 appearances
S. B. D. WahlCounsel
2 appearances
Lewis GottheilCounsel
2 appearances
George TealUnion representative
2 appearances
Frank ManoniCounsel
2 appearances
J. James NymanCounsel
2 appearances
Ian S. CampbellCounsel
2 appearances
David StrangCounsel
2 appearances
Beverly BrushCounsel
1 appearance
Bill FairserviceUnion representative
1 appearance
Bill StammlerUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Mr. ReillyAgent
1 appearance

for the applicant/complainant

Bob HillAgent
1 appearance
Anthony J. WiceCounsel
1 appearance
Bob BoothUnion representative
1 appearance
Brian SheehanCounsel
1 appearance
Casey J. MaticiwUnion representative
1 appearance
E. G. PosenCounsel
1 appearance
E. G. PosenAgent
1 appearance
Eugene LaliberteCounsel
1 appearance
G. Charney, Q. C.Counsel
1 appearance
Jeffrey Sack, Q. C.Counsel
1 appearance
J. I. MarchildonCounsel
1 appearance
Paul FalzoneCounsel
1 appearance
Steven BarrettCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicants

R. A. WerryCounsel
2 appearances
J. McCarronCounsel
1 appearance
Andy PilatCounsel
1 appearance
Jim ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce BinningCounsel
1 appearance

for The Canadian Union of Public Employees, Metropolitan Toronto Civic Employees Union, Local 43

L. A. RichmondCounsel
1 appearance
J. MeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Christian Labour Association of Canada

Elizabeth ForsterCounsel
1 appearance
Win. R. Herridge, Q. C.Counsel
1 appearance
Kerry LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Edward VanderkloetCounsel
1 appearance

for the complainant

William MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Howard S. SwartzCounsel
2 appearances
Laurence C. ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Marcel LaframboiseAgent
1 appearance
Mary CornishCounsel
1 appearance
Matthew BakkerUnion representative
1 appearance
M. GottiheilCounsel
1 appearance
Michael BowmanCounsel
1 appearance
Michael LynkAgent
1 appearance
Michael MihajlovicCounsel
1 appearance
Michael O'MalleyUnion representative
1 appearance
Narindar SinghAgent
1 appearance
Norm CarriereUnion representative
1 appearance
P. A. SheppardAgent
1 appearance
Paul D. BlundyCounsel
1 appearance
Alex AheeAgent
1 appearance
Al P. De WachterAgent
1 appearance
Barbara J. GreenwoodCounsel
1 appearance
Bernie FarberUnion representative
1 appearance
Bob SlevaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Cameron Douglas WonchSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ladelle HilesSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the complainants

A. M. MinskyCounsel
3 appearances
David BloomCounsel
2 appearances
James HayesCounsel
1 appearance
J. Sack, Q. C.Counsel
1 appearance
Lorne RichmondCounsel
1 appearance
M. LloydCounsel
1 appearance
S. C. BernardoCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas P. NortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
T. NeilCounsel
1 appearance
Tom ConnollyCounsel
1 appearance
Tom WilsonCounsel
1 appearance
Ugo RossiniCounsel
1 appearance
W HowardCounsel
1 appearance
Win. HowardCounsel
1 appearance
B. WestAgent
1 appearance
Frank ReilleyAgent
1 appearance
James HavesCounsel
1 appearance

for the complainants/applicants

O. V. GrayCounsel
1 appearance
Ed VanderkloetCounsel
1 appearance
Ernest BelangerCounsel
1 appearance
John AdemaCounsel
1 appearance
Susan CollinsCounsel
1 appearance
William S. ChallisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Employer

Anthony SleegersAgent
1 appearance
P. M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Wm. SleegersAgent
1 appearance

for the Employer Bargaining Agency and the Ontario Painting Contractors Association

Cliff HaneyAgent
1 appearance
Herb ButcherAgent
1 appearance
Robin B. Cumine, Q. C.Counsel
1 appearance

for the group of employees

Bernie DuhamelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bruce DaweAgent
1 appearance
Denis ConnollySelf-represented
1 appearance
Desmond YeoAgent
1 appearance
Harold MacKaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Issac LangsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jack CharronSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Michael WooghCounsel
1 appearance
Monika PlessAgent
1 appearance
Patrick MascarenhasAgent
1 appearance
Paul HarwoodAgent
1 appearance
Philip B. MorrisseyCounsel
1 appearance
Ron germainSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ron MooreSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the International Association

A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance
J. H. LyonsUnion representative
1 appearance
J. PhairUnion representative
1 appearance
N. W. WilsonUnion representative
1 appearance

for the International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers and its Local Union 700

Jim HarrowerAgent
1 appearance
Lewis GottheilCounsel
1 appearance
Stephen KrashinskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local #50

M. A. GreenCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Union of Operating Engineers and the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 793

Laurence C. ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Paul FalzoneCounsel
1 appearance
Phil GauthierCounsel
1 appearance

for the intervener

Allen E. GrotkeCounsel
1 appearance
Andre RoyCounsel
1 appearance
B. CarrozziCounsel
1 appearance
Beryl A. M. CoteAgent
1 appearance
Bruce BinningCounsel
1 appearance
Dale WorrellCounsel
1 appearance
Danny MenardCounsel
1 appearance
Dario DisanteCounsel
1 appearance
David StrangCounsel
1 appearance
D. StrangCounsel
1 appearance
Fred BeldhamAgent
1 appearance
George PalanukUnion representative
1 appearance
G. GrossmanCounsel
1 appearance
Giovanni BalanzinAgent
1 appearance
G. WeirCounsel
1 appearance
Harvey SpiegelCounsel
1 appearance
H. BuschAgent
1 appearance
H. ByersAgent
1 appearance
Jack J. SlaughterUnion representative
1 appearance
Jim AndersonAgent
1 appearance

for the Intervener

R. A. WerryCounsel
1 appearance

for the intervener and Ontario General Contractors Association

Jim ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
S. C. BernardoCounsel
1 appearance

for the interveners

P. RoyAgent
1 appearance
S. B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance
T ConnollyAgent
1 appearance

for the intervenor

D. PeelCounsel
1 appearance
M. GordonCounsel
1 appearance
R. KuhmCounsel
1 appearance

for the Labour Relations Bureau of the Ontario General Contractors Association

G. GrossmanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Little Falls Dining Room, Steep Rock Inn and Valenca Restaurant

F. J. W. BickfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Local Unions

Alan MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance
David BloomCounsel
1 appearance
Maurice A. GreenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Mechanical Contractors Association of Ontario

G. GrossmanCounsel
1 appearance
H. J. BuchmuellerAgent
1 appearance

for The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto

H. W. O. DoyleCounsel
1 appearance

for the National Elevator and Escalator Association

W MoranAgent
1 appearance

for the objector

Ken BruecknerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard LoopSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the objectors

Chris St. JohnAgent
1 appearance
Claire PatoineSelf-represented
1 appearance
C. TavaresSelf-represented
1 appearance
D. FarrellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Domenic RedaAgent
1 appearance
Doug RomboSelf-represented
1 appearance
G. DoucetSelf-represented
1 appearance
George LdosCounsel
1 appearance
George W KingCounsel
1 appearance
Helmut DietzAgent
1 appearance
James FysheCounsel
1 appearance
James O'BrienCounsel
1 appearance
J. F. O'BrienCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin WatsonAgent
1 appearance
L. FletcherSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HoranCounsel
1 appearance
Mitch PlummerSelf-represented
1 appearance
M. LaneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter M. WhalenCounsel
1 appearance
R. JonesSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Ontario Form Work Association and New Rise Forming

Jeffrey DavisCounsel
1 appearance
Tony MichaelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Pipe Trades Council of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada and its Local Union 527

S. SimpsonCounsel
1 appearance
T CrystalUnion representative
1 appearance
J. PorterUnion representative
1 appearance

for the predecessor trade union

Jim DonnellyUnion representative
1 appearance
Keith PogueUnion representative
1 appearance

for the respondent

Mark ContiniCounsel
3 appearances
M. ContiniCounsel
3 appearances
E. A. FordCounsel
2 appearances
Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
R. C. FilionCounsel
2 appearances
R. D. PerkinsAgent
2 appearances
K. W. KortCounsel
2 appearances
William HutchisonAgent
2 appearances
Stewart D. SaxeCounsel
2 appearances
L. A. RichmondCounsel
2 appearances
D. Jane Forbes-RobertsCounsel
2 appearances
B. W. BinningCounsel
2 appearances
C. C. WhiteCounsel
1 appearance
C. E. HumphreyAgent
1 appearance
C. F. HumphreyCounsel
1 appearance
C. McClellandCounsel
1 appearance
Cohn MorleyCounsel
1 appearance
C. PikeCounsel
1 appearance
D. A. BrownCounsel
1 appearance
David B. HamiltonCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent Adam Clark Co. Ltd.

Bruce WalkerAgent
1 appearance
Philip J. WolfendenCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent and objectors

Joe KaraiUnion representative
1 appearance
F. G. PosenUnion representative
1 appearance
Jim WalkerUnion representative
1 appearance

for the respondent and Spider Installations Ltd.

W J. OlsenCounsel
1 appearance
M. D. ContiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent and the objector

Ronald PetersenCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent companies

P. J. ThorupCounsel
1 appearance
M. Gordon-WhitingCounsel
1 appearance
M. FreemanCounsel
1 appearance
B. SingletonCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent company

G. GrossmanCounsel
1 appearance
Angela ArkelAgent
1 appearance
Craig SlaterAgent
1 appearance
D. FryzukCounsel
1 appearance
John DerosaAgent
1 appearance
R. Ross DunsmoreCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent employer

Norman A. KeithCounsel
1 appearance
S. LockeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents

J. PhairSelf-represented
2 appearances
E. T. McDermottCounsel
2 appearances
N. A. WilsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
A. M. MinskyCounsel
2 appearances
Susan ZimmermanCounsel
1 appearance
B. FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance
B. Mc QueenCounsel
1 appearance
Brian P SmenkCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce BinningCounsel
1 appearance
B. W. AdamsCounsel
1 appearance
C. MadyAgent
1 appearance
C. PetersonAgent
1 appearance
D. McCullochAgent
1 appearance
F.A.M. TremaiyneCounsel
1 appearance
George HaymanAgent
1 appearance
Gordon SearsonCounsel
1 appearance
G. WhyteCounsel
1 appearance
I. SlopenCounsel
1 appearance
James ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
J. D. JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent Sikora Mechanical Ltd.

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
1 appearance
R. SikoraAgent
1 appearance

for the respondents United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 527; J. Porter

J. PorterAgent
1 appearance
Stanley SimpsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent trade union

Frank RichardsUnion representative
1 appearance
Hugh BuchananUnion representative
1 appearance
Morris ZimmermanUnion representative
1 appearance
Wayne ClarkeUnion representative
1 appearance

for the respondent union

A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance
D. LittleUnion representative
1 appearance
Douglas J. WrayCounsel
1 appearance
J. J. NymanCounsel
1 appearance
M. ZajacAgent
1 appearance
S. B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance
T. ConnollyUnion representative
1 appearance
Tom ConnollyCounsel
1 appearance
Val NealCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent unions

Aranado CollafracchesciCounsel
1 appearance
Laurence C. ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 46

L. C. ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
W. HowardAgent
1 appearance

for the Trade Unions

A. ColafranceschiAgent
1 appearance
A.M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance
L. BanackCounsel
1 appearance

for the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada

Alex AheeCounsel
1 appearance
G. MeservierUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local Union 1244

E. RyanAgent
1 appearance
H. MartinakAgent
1 appearance
James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto District Council of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America

Douglas J. WrayCounsel
1 appearance
Frank RimesCounsel
1 appearance

for United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 628, and George Merservier

Alexander J. AheeCounsel
1 appearance
Barney AndersonAgent
1 appearance
George MeservierAgent
1 appearance

for United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 67

Stanley SimpsonCounsel
1 appearance
Trevor ByrneUnion representative
1 appearance

for United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 27

J. J. NymanCounsel
1 appearance
John GartwrightCounsel
1 appearance

for United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local Union 27

Douglas J. WrayCounsel
1 appearance
John CartwrightCounsel
1 appearance

for Urban Construction Equipment Ltd., employer

Frank CsaszarCounsel
1 appearance

for Yesteryear Grocers Inc.

C. M. McKeown, Q.C.Counsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Margaret A. SampleSelf-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf

Douglas MovesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dudley BurkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
William F. MorganSelf-represented
1 appearance

on their own behalf as employees

Helen McBennettSelf-represented
1 appearance
June MacLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance

146

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

1.9

cases/mo

OLRB146(100%)

Decision types

trial

motion

Page 6 of 8 (146 cases)