Application adjourned to January 22, 2002, at the applicant's request.
The applicant requested an adjournment of the application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and adjourned the matter to January 22, 2002.
Adjournment of union's application granted by the Board.
The applicant union requested an adjournment of its application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and adjourned the matter to January 8, 2002.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Employer ordered to pay damages for collective agreement violation following failure to attend grievance arbitration.
The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to arbitration under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The responding party failed to attend the scheduled hearing.
Proceeding in the responding party's absence, the Board considered the applicant's evidence and found that the responding party was bound by and had violated the collective agreement.
The Board ordered the responding party to pay $10,759.89 in damages and $752.00 in statutory fees.
Adjournment granted on request of the applicant.
Union's request for an adjournment of the application granted.
The applicant union requested an adjournment of its application against the responding party employer.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request.
The matter was adjourned to January 8, 2002.
Application adjourned to January 8, 2002, at the request of the applicant union.
The applicant union requested an adjournment of the application.
The responding party did not appear.
Matter adjourned to a date to be set by the Registrar.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that the matter be adjourned to a date to be set by the Registrar.
Board issues consent order for $13,274.22 in damages following settlement of construction industry grievance.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement settling the matter.
The Board issued a consent order declaring that the responding party was bound by the collective agreement, had violated its terms, and directed the payment of $13,274.22 in damages according to an agreed schedule.
Board directs counting of representation vote ballots and schedules hearing for outstanding issues.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the Manager of Field Services to arrange for the counting of ballots cast in a representation vote held on October 12, 2001.
The Board also directed the Registrar to set the matter down for two days of hearing to address outstanding issues raised by the intervenors.
Application for review of Order to Pay terminated following parties' Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant employers sought a review of an Order to Pay issued by an Employment Standards Officer under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The employers and the respondent employee subsequently entered into Minutes of Settlement to resolve the matter.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the disbursement of the $3,332.77 held in trust by the Director in accordance with the settlement terms, and terminated the application pursuant to section 69.1(5) of the Act.
Order to Pay rescinded after employee failed to attend hearing and Board found he voluntarily quit.
The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay issued under the Employment Standards Act.
The responding party employee failed to attend the hearing.
Based on the employer's representations, the Board found that the employee voluntarily quit and was not terminated, meaning he was not entitled to termination pay.
The Board rescinded the Order to Pay and directed the return of funds held in trust to the applicant.
Grievance dismissed; statutory arbitrator lacks jurisdiction to rectify unambiguous collective agreement regarding travel free zone.
The union referred a grievance to arbitration alleging the employer failed to pay a travel allowance for work at a plant in Smith Falls.
The employer argued the plant was within the 'travel free zone' defined in the collective agreement.
The Board found the language of the collective agreement unambiguous and concluded the plant was within the travel free zone.
The Board rejected the union's request to call extrinsic evidence and held that, as a statutory arbitrator, it lacked jurisdiction to rectify the collective agreement to correct an alleged mutual mistake.
The grievance was dismissed.
Board directs second representation vote for construction labourers following parties' Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant union and responding employer entered into Minutes of Settlement regarding the arrangements for a second representation vote directed by the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board ordered the vote to take place on December 18, 2001, for a defined constituency of construction labourers.
The Board noted the agreed-upon voters list and the applicant's challenge to one individual's eligibility.
Employer violated statutory freeze by informing employees of existing benefit plan; second vote ordered.
The applicant union filed an application for certification and an unfair labour practice complaint.
After losing the initial representation vote, the union brought a motion alleging the employer breached the statutory freeze provisions under section 86(2) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The employer had advised employees of an existing benefit plan shortly before the vote, which the employees were previously unaware of.
The Board found that bringing the benefit plan to the employees' attention effectively altered their conditions of employment, violating the statutory freeze.
Consequently, the Board ordered a second representation vote pursuant to section 11 of the Act.
Application dismissed after the Ministry of Labour rescinded the underlying order.
The applicant appealed an order issued by the Ministry of Labour.
The Board was advised that the Ministry of Labour had rescinded the order that was the subject matter of the application.
Consequently, the Board dismissed the application.
Board resolves preliminary procedural matters including standing, order of proceedings, and document production in Ministerial reference.
In a Ministerial reference regarding the authority to appoint a conciliation officer, the Ontario Labour Relations Board addressed preliminary procedural matters.
The Board granted standing to the IUOE and Dibblee Paving on consent, set hearing dates, and determined the order of proceedings.
The Board also ordered the National Capital Road Builders Association to produce various membership, corporate, and meeting records to the unions, while denying the production of financial records at this stage.
Time extended for application for review of Order to Pay after applicant provided proof of payment.
The applicant sought a review of an Order to Pay directing it to pay $4,596.00 in unpaid wages and statutory administration costs.
The Board previously noted the applicant failed to comply with s. 68(7) of the Employment Standards Act by not paying the required amount to the Director in Trust.
The applicant subsequently provided proof of payment and reasons for an extension of time.
The Board exercised its discretion under s. 68(4) to extend the time for applying for review, found the application timely, and directed the Registrar to process the matter in the normal course.
Application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The applicant filed an application against the responding party union.
On the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the application will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.