Tribunal scheduled a 19-day merit hearing and ordered a revised issues list for redevelopment appeals.
The Ontario Land Tribunal held a second case management conference regarding appeals by the applicant against the city's failure to make decisions on requests to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and to approve a proposed plan of subdivision for the redevelopment of parts of a golf course.
The Tribunal directed the parties to revise the draft Issues List to be organized by issue rather than by party to avoid overlap.
A 19-day merit hearing was scheduled to commence on March 5, 2024.
Tribunal scheduled a 19-day hearing and directed parties to reorganize the issues list by issue.
The appellant appealed the municipality's failure to make a decision on applications for an official plan amendment, zoning by-law amendment, and plan of subdivision to permit the redevelopment of parts of a golf course.
At the second case management conference, the Tribunal directed the parties to revise the draft issues list to be organized by issue rather than by party to avoid overlap.
The Tribunal also scheduled a 19-day hearing and provided directions regarding the calling of lay witnesses and the participation of added parties.
Tribunal schedules a third Case Management Conference to allow parties to continue settlement discussions.
A Case Management Conference was convened to consider an appeal against the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on requested Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments for an 11-storey residential building.
The appellant requested an adjournment to a third Case Management Conference to allow for further discussions and potential design changes.
The other parties consented to the request.
The Tribunal granted the adjournment and scheduled a third Case Management Conference for June 2023.
Tribunal grants party status to community group and participant status to individuals at first CMC.
At a Case Management Conference for appeals concerning Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments in the City of Kingston, the Tribunal considered requests for party and participant status.
The Tribunal granted participant status to numerous individuals whose requests were not objected to by the appellant, deferring the objected requests to a future CMC.
The Tribunal also granted party status to No Clearcuts Kingston Inc., applying the Oakville factors and finding that the group's participation would advance the public interest without causing prejudice or a multiplicity of proceedings.
A further CMC was scheduled to finalize the procedural order and issues list.