Board directed two related applications to be listed before the same panel to determine hearing format.
The applicants requested that two applications relating to the same subject matter be heard together.
The intervenor/responding party opposed the request because the applications involved different applicants and respondents.
The Board directed that the applications be listed for hearing before the same panel, leaving the determination of whether they will be heard together, consecutively, or otherwise to that panel.
National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) and its Local 830 v. Omni Health Care Ltd., 2001 CanLII 16896