The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and proposed a different, more inclusive unit.
The Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support to order a representation vote.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with certain ballots segregated pending resolution of the bargaining unit dispute.
The applicant's request for a mail-in ballot was denied.
A dissenting Board member would have ordered the ballot box sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.