Inge M. Stamp

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 28, 2001

Applicant directed to file submissions establishing provincial jurisdiction over an inter-provincial trucking employer.

The applicant sought a review of an Employment Standards Officer's decision refusing to investigate his claim against an inter-provincial trucking company on the basis that the employer falls under federal jurisdiction.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board noted that the employer appeared to be a federal undertaking and directed the self-represented applicant to file submissions outlining the basis for the Board's jurisdiction within 10 days, failing which the application would be terminated.

Nebil Osman v. A-1 World-Wide Moving and Storage Ltd., 2001 CanLII 6385

Inge M. Stamp

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 27, 2001

Applications adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.

The applicant union filed two applications against the responding party employer.

On the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the applications sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which they will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.

International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local 50 v. Thyssen Krupp Elevator, 2001 CanLII 2691

Inge M. Stamp

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 27, 2001

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the applicant's request.

The applicant, Property Services Inc., requested to withdraw its application against the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal and the Ministry of Labour.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

Property Services Inc. v. The Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal, 2001 CanLII 3615

Application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.

The applicant union brought an application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

On the agreement of the parties, the Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it would be deemed terminated if no party requested to proceed.

Allied Construction Employees, Local 1030 United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Neway Construction Ltd., 2001 CanLII 14856

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 24, 2001

Board directs representation vote in construction industry certification application and orders ballot box sealed.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Act.

The intervenor claimed to represent affected employees but failed to provide a copy of its collective agreement.

Finding that the applicant appeared to have the requisite 40 percent membership support, the Board defined the appropriate bargaining unit and directed that a representation vote be held, with the ballot box to be sealed pending resolution of the disputes.

Labourers’ International Union of North America v. Marciano Doors & Trim Co. Ltd., 2001 CanLII 11296

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 24, 2001

Time for filing a response to related employer/sale of business application extended.

The responding party requested an extension of time to file a response to an application under sections 69 and 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, extending the time for filing a response to September 4, 2001.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1687 v. Kvaerner Cementation Division, Kvaerner Canada Inc., Kvaerner Constructors Ltd. and Cementation Skanska Canada Inc., 2001 CanLII 14062

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 24, 2001

Default judgment issued against employer for unpaid benefit contributions and union dues under collective agreement.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding employer failed to remit benefit contributions, pay vacation pay, and hire through the union office.

The responding party failed to file a response or notice of intent to defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the Board deemed the facts in the application accepted and issued a default decision.

The Board declared the employer bound by the collective agreement, found it in violation, and ordered it to pay $6,368.69 in damages plus $214.00 in costs.

The Ontario Council of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, (Local Union 200) v. Vision 2000 Division of 2786630 Canada Inc., 2001 CanLII 18686

Inge M. Stamp

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 23, 2001

Application for review of Order to Pay dismissed after employer stopped payment on trust cheque.

The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay issued under the Employment Standards Act.

The Ministry of Labour advised the Board that the applicant's cheque accompanying the application was returned with a 'payment stopped' notice.

The Board dismissed the application for review because the applicant failed to comply with section 68(7) of the Act, which requires the order amount to be paid in trust before a review can proceed.

Olympia Business Machines Canada Ltd. v. Steve Cronk and Ministry of Labour, 2001 CanLII 11342

Inge M. Stamp

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 23, 2001

Adjournment request denied as not all parties consented; matter to proceed as scheduled.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the hearing until January 2002, citing that the period from September to the end of the year is its busiest time.

The responding party opposed the request, noting that it had been a year since his termination and he wished for the matter to conclude.

As not all parties consented, the Board denied the adjournment and directed that the matter proceed as scheduled, noting the applicant could renew its request before the hearing panel.

Personelle Limousine Ltd. v. John Zuwala, 2001 CanLII 10135

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 22, 2001

Employer ordered to pay over $25,000 in unpaid union dues and benefit contributions in default proceeding.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging the responding party employer failed to remit union dues and benefit fund contributions.

The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board found the responding party bound by the provincial collective agreement and ordered it to pay $25,483.58 in damages and $214.00 in costs.

The International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, (Local Union 1494/1590) v. City Acoustics Ltd., 2001 CanLII 2849

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 22, 2001

Employer ordered to pay over $29,000 in damages for unpaid wages and benefits in default grievance decision.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding employer failed to pay proper wages, benefits, and union dues pursuant to the provincial collective agreement.

The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board found the employer violated the collective agreement, cancelled the scheduled hearing, and ordered the employer to pay $29,587.81 in damages and $214.00 in costs.

The Ontario Council of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, (Local Union 200) v. Ener Glass Construction Inc., 2001 CanLII 16500

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 21, 2001

Grievance adjourned sine die pending filing of work assignment application by intervenor.

The applicant union and the intervenor agreed to adjourn the grievance sine die pending the filing of a work assignment application by the intervenor.

The responding party employer failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend/Participate.

The Board adjourned the matter sine die for a period not exceeding one year, and cancelled the scheduled hearing.

International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 736 v. The On-Site Group Inc., 2001 CanLII 3382

Inge M. Stamp

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 21, 2001

Extension of time granted to file an application for review of an Order to Pay.

The applicant employer sought an extension of time to file an application for review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The Board exercised its discretion under section 68(4) of the Act to extend the time for filing the application from August 7, 2001 to August 9, 2001.

Destiny Capital Management v. Boris Petkovski, Chantale Mantha and Ministry of Labour, 2001 CanLII 3711

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 21, 2001

Board orders representation vote in construction industry certification application after finding requisite membership support.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding party failed to file its response within the stipulated time.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that it appeared to have the requisite membership support of at least forty percent in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board defined the appropriate bargaining unit and directed that a representation vote be taken.

Labourers’ International Union of North America v. Colangelo Carpentry Co. Ltd., 2001 CanLII 4471

Inge M. Stamp

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 20, 2001

Board issued procedural directions regarding notice and filing deadlines for an affected employer.

The Minister of Labour referred a question to the Board.

The Board issued procedural directions regarding notice to affected employers, specifically addressing confusion from 'The Ganawa Company Ltd.' about its inclusion in the application.

The Board directed the Registrar to send copies of earlier decisions to Ganawa and extended the deadline for Ganawa to file its materials and statement of representations ahead of the rescheduled hearing.

Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 527 v. National Capital Road Builders Association, 2001 CanLII 13861

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 9, 2001

Board issues consent orders enforcing Minutes of Settlement for $25,173.52 in unpaid union remittances.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into Minutes of Settlement wherein the responding employer acknowledged violating the collective agreement by failing to make timely remittances to various health, welfare, and pension funds.

The employer agreed to pay $25,173.52 for the June 2001 work month.

The Board issued consent orders incorporating the Minutes of Settlement.

Universal Workers’ Union, L.I.U.N.A., Local 183 v. Pro-Drain (1984) Construction Limited, 2001 CanLII 3542

Michael O'Brien

8 cases1999–2012

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 9, 2001

Employer ordered to pay $52,818.86 for failing to make required union fund remittances.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging the responding party employer failed to make required remittances to health, welfare, and pension funds.

The responding party did not appear at the hearing.

The Board found that the responding party violated the collective agreement by failing to remit payments for April, May, and June 2001, despite filing contribution reports.

The Board ordered the responding party to pay $52,818.86 in damages, including liquidated damages, and ordered a related entity to pay $214.00 in costs.

Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 183 v. 517739 Ontario Limited o/a Rolan Plumbing, 2001 CanLII 10980

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 9, 2001

Employer ordered to pay over $69,000 in unpaid union remittances following default grievance hearing.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding party employer failed to make required health, welfare, and pension fund remittances.

The responding party did not appear at the hearing.

Based on the documentary and viva voce evidence, the Board found the employer violated the collective agreement and ordered it to pay $69,277.47 in damages, plus $214.00 in statutory costs.

Universal Worker’s Union, L.I.U.N.A., Local 183 v. Select Concrete & Drain Inc., 2001 CanLII 16216

McMenemy

OLRB0 cases2000–2001

Inge M. Stamp

G. Pickell

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 2, 2001

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the applicant's request.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

United Association of Journeymen and apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local Union 527 v. Wm. Roberts Electrical & Mechanical Inc., 2001 CanLII 13737

Yvon Therrien

1 case2001–2001

Mike McCreary

20 cases1991–2019

Joseph Russo

1 case2001–2001

Ivan Ivankovic

1 case2001–2001

E. C. Carla Zabek

7 cases1993–2015

Inge M. Stamp