H. Peacock

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMar 24, 2000

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant, Paul Piels Jr., sought to withdraw his application against Tony Larocca and General Motors of Canada Limited.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Paul Piels Jr. v. Tony Larocca and General Motors of Canada Limited, 2000 CanLII 2153

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMar 24, 2000

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant, Christian Labour Association of Canada, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, 1057905 Ontario Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Christian Labour Association of Canada v. 1057905 Ontario Inc., 2000 CanLII 7070

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMar 24, 2000

Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure majority support in representation vote.

The United Steelworkers of America applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of Royal Laser Tech Corporation.

Following a representation vote where not more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.

The Board imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for this bargaining unit.

United Steelworkers of America v. Royal Laser Tech Corporation, 2000 CanLII 7120

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Representation vote ordered in displacement application; ballot box sealed pending hearing on injunction.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

The Board found that the applicant had the requisite membership support and ordered a representation vote.

The intervenor union argued that a Superior Court injunction against individuals associated with the applicant precluded the vote.

The Board ordered the vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed pending a hearing to determine the effect of the injunction.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Tillsonburg District Memorial Hospital (Full time), 2000 CanLII 12701

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Union's application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers’ Union of Canada (CAW – Canada) v. Brouillette Manor 1230839 Ontario Limited, 2000 CanLII 1303

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Representation vote ordered in displacement application, but ballot box sealed pending hearing on injunction.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and that it had sufficient membership support to order a representation vote.

The intervenor union argued that a Superior Court injunction against individuals associated with the applicant precluded the vote.

The Board ordered the representation vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed pending a hearing to determine the effect of the injunction.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Middlesex Terrace, 2000 CanLII 13585

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Representation vote ordered in displacement certification application, but ballot box sealed pending hearing on injunction.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and that it had the requisite membership support to order a representation vote.

The intervenor union requested that the vote not be held or that the ballot box be sealed, citing a Superior Court injunction against individuals formerly associated with the intervenor.

The Board ordered the representation vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed pending a hearing to determine the effect of the court order.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Middlesex Terrace (Part-time), 2000 CanLII 13584

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Representation vote ordered in displacement application, but ballot box sealed pending hearing on injunction.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor union.

The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite 40% membership support and ordered a representation vote.

The intervenor requested that the application be dismissed or the vote delayed due to a Superior Court injunction against individuals formerly associated with the intervenor.

The Board ordered the vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed pending a hearing to determine the effect of the court order.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Craigwiel Gardens c.o.b. as Craigholme Nursing Home (Part-time), 2000 CanLII 13504

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Representation vote ordered in displacement application, but ballot box sealed pending hearing on intervenor's injunction.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and that it had sufficient membership support to order a representation vote.

The intervenor argued that a Superior Court injunction prevented the vote or required the ballot box to be sealed.

The Board ordered the representation vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed pending a hearing to consider the effect of the Court's order.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Country Terrace Nursing Home (Part-Time), 2000 CanLII 13006

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Representation vote ordered in displacement application, but ballot box sealed pending hearing on injunction.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor.

The Board found that the applicant had the requisite 40% membership support and ordered a representation vote.

The intervenor argued that a Superior Court injunction against individuals associated with the applicant precluded the vote.

The Board ordered the vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed pending a hearing on the effect of the injunction.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Tillsonburg District Memorial Hospital (Part-time), 2000 CanLII 12704

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Representation vote ordered in displacement application, but ballot box sealed pending hearing on court injunction.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor union.

The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite 40% membership support and ordered a representation vote.

The intervenor requested that the application be dismissed or the vote delayed due to a Superior Court injunction against individuals formerly associated with the intervenor.

The Board directed that the vote proceed but ordered the ballot box sealed pending a hearing to determine the effect of the court order on the Board's processes.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Craigwiel Gardens c.o.b. as Craigholme Nursing Home, 2000 CanLII 12637

Timothy W. Sargeant

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Representation vote ordered in displacement application, but ballot box sealed pending hearing on court injunction.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and that it had sufficient membership support to order a representation vote.

The intervenor argued that a recent Superior Court injunction against individuals associated with the applicant should prevent the vote or require the ballot box to be sealed.

Following its recent decision in Delhi Nursing Home, the Board ordered the representation vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed pending a hearing on the effect of the court order.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Country Terrace Nursing Home (Full-Time), 2000 CanLII 12608

Patrick Kelly

OLRB0 cases1999–2019

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMar 17, 2000

Representation vote ordered in displacement application, but ballot box sealed pending hearing on court injunction.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor union.

The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite 40% membership support and ordered a representation vote.

However, because the intervenor raised concerns about a recent Superior Court injunction against individuals now associated with the applicant, the Board directed that the ballot box be sealed and the ballots not counted until a hearing could be held to determine the effect of the court order on the Board's processes.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Maplewood Nursing Home Ltd., 2000 CanLII 9093

J. A. Rundle

H. Peacock

Christopher J. Albertyn

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMar 16, 2000

Representation vote directed in termination application; union's request to seal ballots due to employer initiation allegations denied.

The applicants applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

The union sought to dismiss the application without a vote or to seal the ballot box, alleging employer initiation under subsection 63(16) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found the application timely and the allegations insufficient to prevent the vote or seal the ballots at this stage.

The Board directed that a representation vote be held, with the union's allegations to be dealt with in the ordinary course at a hearing.

David Weisenberg et al. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America et al., 2000 CanLII 9032

J. A. Rundle

H. Peacock

Christopher J. Albertyn

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMar 16, 2000

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

United Steelworkers of America v. Kafko Manufacturing Limited, 2000 CanLII 8925

J. A. Rundle

H. Peacock

Christopher J. Albertyn

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 175 & 633 v. Hallmark Housekeeping Services Inc., 2000 CanLII 3689

J. A. Rundle

H. Peacock

Christopher J. Albertyn

Representation vote ordered in displacement certification application, with ballot box sealed pending hearing on injunction.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor union at Delhi Nursing Home.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that not less than forty percent of the proposed bargaining unit were members.

The Board ordered a representation vote.

The intervenor argued that a recent Superior Court injunction against individuals formerly associated with the intervenor prevented the vote or required the ballot box to be sealed.

The Board ordered the vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed pending a hearing to consider the intervenor's arguments regarding the court order.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Delhi Nursing Home, 2000 CanLII 11833

J. A. Rundle

H. Peacock

Christopher J. Albertyn

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicants sought to withdraw their application against the responding party union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Kevin Good et al. v. The United Steelworkers of America, Local 9042, 2000 CanLII 1343

J. A. Rundle

H. Peacock

Christopher J. Albertyn