Board corrects typographical errors in file numbers from a previous decision.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a decision to correct typographical errors in a previous decision dated May 11, 2000.
The Board amended paragraphs 1 and 2 to reflect the correct Board File Number.
Bad faith bargaining complaint dismissed; expired collective agreement terms supersede pre-existing service agreements for dependent contractors.
The union filed an unfair labour practice complaint alleging the employers bargained in bad faith by insisting on terms regarding insurance and brokerage fees that were worse than those in the pre-existing service agreements.
The Board held that once the parties bargained a collective agreement (or had one imposed by arbitration), the service agreement terms on those subjects were superseded.
Following the expiry of the statutory freeze, the employers were entitled to alter those terms.
The bad faith bargaining complaint was dismissed.
Board orders representation vote between two unions for service employees following hospital amalgamation.
The applicant hospital applied under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act, 1997 following an amalgamation.
The parties reached a Memorandum of Agreement defining the full-time and part-time service bargaining units and agreeing to a representation vote between two unions.
The Board issued orders reflecting the parties' agreement, directing a vote and establishing campaign access rules.
Pre-hearing production of documents ordered in related employer and sale of business application, subject to confidentiality.
The applicant union sought pre-hearing production of numerous documents in an application under sections 69 and 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board ordered the responding parties to produce relevant existing documents, including policy manuals, client files, occurrence reports, and employee lists, subject to strict confidentiality conditions and the removal of identifying patient information.
The Board declined to order the creation of new documents or the production of highly confidential financial information, and directed the applicant to pay reasonable copying costs.
Board directed applicant to consider amending duty of fair representation complaint to duty of fair referral.
The applicant filed an unfair labour practice complaint alleging the union breached its duty of fair representation under section 74 of the Labour Relations Act by failing to provide him with regular employment from the hiring hall.
The Board noted that the allegations pertained to the union's hiring hall list and were more appropriately characterized as a duty of fair referral complaint under section 75.
The Board directed the Registrar to provide the applicant with the necessary forms to amend his application to a section 75 complaint within 15 days, and deferred ruling on the union's request to dismiss the matter on a prima facie basis.
Employer's appeal of Order to Pay dismissed for failing to pay full amount into trust.
The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act.
The application was filed late, and the employer failed to pay the full amount of the Order into trust, having only paid a portion through a collection agency arrangement.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application, holding that it had no discretion to waive the mandatory requirement under section 68(7) of the Act to pay the full amount into trust pending the outcome of the appeal.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant, Christian Labour Association of Canada, sought to withdraw its application against Stephens & Rankin Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Application terminated following settlement between the parties.
The applicant filed an application against the employer and the Ministry of Labour.
Following a settlement reached between the parties on May 17, 2000, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the application terminated.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Grievance referral adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the grievance referral sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the application will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.
Representation vote directed in construction industry application for union certification.
The applicant union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and an affiliated bargaining agent.
Based on the membership evidence filed, the Board determined that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible construction labourers.
Employer ordered to pay $37,499 in unpaid benefit remittances in default grievance referral.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding employer failed to remit benefit contributions and vacation pay.
The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.
Proceeding by default, the Board accepted the union's allegations as true, declared the employer bound by the collective agreement, and ordered the employer to pay $37,499.00 in damages for unpaid remittances, plus $214.00 for filing fees.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.
The applicant sought to withdraw her application against the responding party.
Employment standards appeal terminated due to applicant's failure to file required forms within the deadline.
The applicant sought to appeal an Order to Pay but failed to file a formal application on the proper forms.
The Board notified the applicant of the deficiency and provided a 10-day deadline to file the required forms.
The applicant failed to file the application within the deadline.
Consequently, the Board terminated the matter.
Employer's application for review of Order to Pay dismissed for failure to pay monies into trust.
Although the application was filed within the 45-day time limit, the applicant failed to pay the amount of the Order into trust with the Director of Employment Standards, as required by section 68(7) of the Act.
The Board gave the applicant an opportunity to perfect the application, but no response was received.
As the Board has no discretion to waive this requirement, the application for review was dismissed.
Appeal of Order to Pay terminated due to applicant's failure to file required forms.
The applicant sought to appeal an Order to Pay but failed to file the formal application on the proper forms as required by the Board's Rules of Procedure.
Despite being sent the required forms and given a 10-day deadline, the applicant did not file the application.
The Board terminated the matter.
The applicant, Tridel Construction (Skymark West Inc.), sought to withdraw its application against the Ministry of Labour.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Representation vote ordered in construction industry certification application after employer failed to respond.
The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The responding party failed to file a response within the stipulated time.
Based on the application and membership evidence, the Board found that not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.
The Board determined the appropriate bargaining unit and directed that a representation vote be taken.