The Member, a former Director of Education, faced allegations of professional misconduct for plagiarizing material in opinion pieces, speeches, blog posts, and books published between 2002 and 2013.
The Member pled guilty to the allegations but sought to provide context, claiming he received writing assistance due to his busy schedule.
The Discipline Committee found the Member's evidence unpersuasive and concluded that he engaged in professional misconduct.
The Committee held that plagiarism is notorious conduct that does not require expert evidence to establish a breach of professional standards.
The Member was found to have failed to maintain the standards of the profession, issued false or misleading documents, failed to comply with the Education Act, and engaged in disgraceful, dishonourable, unprofessional, and unbecoming conduct.