The applicant union brought a motion requesting that the Vice-Chair step down from hearing the application due to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
The applicant argued that the Vice-Chair's prior professional background representing international unions, a previous administrative scheduling decision, findings of fact in a prior related decision, and the exercise of discretion in that prior decision created a reasonable apprehension of bias.
The Board dismissed the motion, finding that none of the grounds raised, individually or cumulatively, met the high threshold for establishing a reasonable apprehension of bias by an informed person viewing the matter realistically and practically.